'Historic': NA passes bill to ban corporal punishment in the capital

Published February 23, 2021
The proposed law will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention. — Photo by Mustafa Ilyas/File
The proposed law will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention. — Photo by Mustafa Ilyas/File

The National Assembly on Tuesday passed a bill banning corporal punishment in the capital and setting out penalties for persons physically punishing children, in a development hailed by child rights groups.

The ICT Prohibition of Corporal Punishment Bill effectively bans all forms of corporal punishment “however light” at the workplace, in all types of educational institutions including formal, informal, and religious — both public and private, in child care institutions including foster care, rehabilitation centres and any other alternative care settings.

The proposed law, which will now go to the Senate, will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention, cancelling out the provisions of Section 89 of the Pakistan Penal Code which had allowed teachers and guardians to administer physical punishment “in good faith” and “for the benefit” of the child, according to a statement by Zindagi Trust, which termed the development "historic".

Analyse: Discipline or abuse?

A private member bill moved by Mehnaz Akbar Aziz of the PML-N, it had been passed by the National Assembly Standing Committee on Education as far back as 2019 but could not make progress as discussion on the legislation was withheld for 15 months after which it was referred to another committee, where it remained pending.

While appreciating the efforts of civil society, treasury and opposition benches, Justice Athar Minallah of the Islamabad High Court, Shehzad Roy and others that enabled the passage of the bill, Aziz said: “Protecting our children requires more than passing this bill. The rules of business have to be clarified and the mindset that legitimises corporal punishment needs to be changed through informative awareness campaigns.”

Human Rights Minister Shireen Mazari presented an amendment under which complaints put forward by children would be brought before a court or a magistrate instead of leaving the complaint procedures vague. The amendment was made part of the bill before the lower house gave clause by clause approval to it.

Organisations and activists working for child protection had impressed upon the parliament to pass the legislation urgently. A petition in the IHC by musician Shehzad Roy's Zindagi Trust, which has been campaigning to get the practice banned for several years, had last year led to a court order suspending Section 89 and effectively banning corporal punishment.

Child rights activists and lawyers Syed Miqdad Mehdi and Ahmar Majeed, whose petition in the Lahore High Court (LHC) led to a ban on corporal punishment in all schools after a horrific incident against special children, identified Section 89 as the impediment to any step taken against the practice of corporal punishment. According to Mehdi, “corporal punishment is against children’s fundamental rights of dignity, survival, development and protection and should be curbed as soon as possible through legislative measures.”

“When a child gets physical punishment, society is telling them — and an entire generation — that violence is a valid means of resolving a problem. This law will not just protect our children but also lay the foundation for a safer, kinder and more peaceful Pakistan,” remarked Roy.

Zindagi Trust in its press release emphasised that in order to ensure the law had a practical impact, it was necessary that the federal government devised accompanying rules of business — covering referral mechanisms, reporting and penalties as well as systematic national awareness programmes — within six months as advised in the bill.


With additional reporting by Fahad Chaudhry in Islamabad.

Opinion

Vaccine uptake
26 Feb 2021

Vaccine uptake

The reasons for refusal need to be carefully recorded.

Editorial

Terrorist’s escape
Updated 26 Feb 2021

Terrorist’s escape

It is not clear how many military personnel were involved in this incident and what the investigation into their actions revealed.
26 Feb 2021

Penalising filers

THE FBR has decided to penalise taxpayers filing their returns late. Apparently, these filers will be required to ...
26 Feb 2021

Corporal punishment

FOR a child born in our society, the cycle of violence begins early. The first taste of violence often comes at the...
IHK & human rights
Updated 25 Feb 2021

IHK & human rights

If India continues to be pampered and the Kashmiris’ plight ignored, peace in South Asia will remain a distant dream.
25 Feb 2021

A better law

THAT the Sindh Police has taken an initiative to bring improvements to the criminal justice system is a positive...
25 Feb 2021

Power breakdown report

A NEPRA inquiry into last month’s power breakdown that left almost the entire country without electricity for up ...