'Historic': NA passes bill to ban corporal punishment in the capital

Published February 23, 2021
The proposed law will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention. — Photo by Mustafa Ilyas/File
The proposed law will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention. — Photo by Mustafa Ilyas/File

The National Assembly on Tuesday passed a bill banning corporal punishment in the capital and setting out penalties for persons physically punishing children, in a development hailed by child rights groups.

The ICT Prohibition of Corporal Punishment Bill effectively bans all forms of corporal punishment “however light” at the workplace, in all types of educational institutions including formal, informal, and religious — both public and private, in child care institutions including foster care, rehabilitation centres and any other alternative care settings.

The proposed law, which will now go to the Senate, will penalise teachers for assault and hurt inflicted upon children, regardless of intention, cancelling out the provisions of Section 89 of the Pakistan Penal Code which had allowed teachers and guardians to administer physical punishment “in good faith” and “for the benefit” of the child, according to a statement by Zindagi Trust, which termed the development "historic".

Analyse: Discipline or abuse?

A private member bill moved by Mehnaz Akbar Aziz of the PML-N, it had been passed by the National Assembly Standing Committee on Education as far back as 2019 but could not make progress as discussion on the legislation was withheld for 15 months after which it was referred to another committee, where it remained pending.

While appreciating the efforts of civil society, treasury and opposition benches, Justice Athar Minallah of the Islamabad High Court, Shehzad Roy and others that enabled the passage of the bill, Aziz said: “Protecting our children requires more than passing this bill. The rules of business have to be clarified and the mindset that legitimises corporal punishment needs to be changed through informative awareness campaigns.”

Human Rights Minister Shireen Mazari presented an amendment under which complaints put forward by children would be brought before a court or a magistrate instead of leaving the complaint procedures vague. The amendment was made part of the bill before the lower house gave clause by clause approval to it.

Organisations and activists working for child protection had impressed upon the parliament to pass the legislation urgently. A petition in the IHC by musician Shehzad Roy's Zindagi Trust, which has been campaigning to get the practice banned for several years, had last year led to a court order suspending Section 89 and effectively banning corporal punishment.

Child rights activists and lawyers Syed Miqdad Mehdi and Ahmar Majeed, whose petition in the Lahore High Court (LHC) led to a ban on corporal punishment in all schools after a horrific incident against special children, identified Section 89 as the impediment to any step taken against the practice of corporal punishment. According to Mehdi, “corporal punishment is against children’s fundamental rights of dignity, survival, development and protection and should be curbed as soon as possible through legislative measures.”

“When a child gets physical punishment, society is telling them — and an entire generation — that violence is a valid means of resolving a problem. This law will not just protect our children but also lay the foundation for a safer, kinder and more peaceful Pakistan,” remarked Roy.

Zindagi Trust in its press release emphasised that in order to ensure the law had a practical impact, it was necessary that the federal government devised accompanying rules of business — covering referral mechanisms, reporting and penalties as well as systematic national awareness programmes — within six months as advised in the bill.


With additional reporting by Fahad Chaudhry in Islamabad.

Opinion

Who benefits more?
Updated 03 Aug 2021

Who benefits more?

It’s been widely assumed that China was always going to secure the most benefits.
Back to the future
Updated 02 Aug 2021

Back to the future

A civil war next door would pose serious threats to Pakistan’s security and multidimensional challenges.

Editorial

03 Aug 2021

Changing GB’s status

THE government’s plans to accord a provisional provincial status to Gilgit-Baltistan are progressing steadily and...
Taliban assault
03 Aug 2021

Taliban assault

Intra-Afghan peace talks should be promoted, but the global community must be ready for the imminent collapse of the Afghan state.
03 Aug 2021

Cancelling Aurat March

THE cancellation of Aurat March Faisalabad is exactly one of those ‘isolated incidents’ which, when viewed...
02 Aug 2021

Row over NCSW

SOME matters are simply too important to play politics on. Protection of women’s rights is one of them....
02 Aug 2021

Mismanaging LNG

PAKISTAN’S purchase of expensive LNG cargoes for the September-October delivery in less than three weeks after...
Against their will
Updated 02 Aug 2021

Against their will

Estimates indicate that some 1,000 girls from minority communities are forcibly converted to Islam every year in Pakistan.