ISLAMABAD: The federal government has agreed to ‘review’ controversial rules framed to enforce the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) against ‘unwanted’ social media feeds.

Representing the federal government before the Islamabad High Court (IHC), the Attorney General for Pakistan assured that he would invite relevant stakeholders as well as the petitioners to review the social media rules.

The petitioners are Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists (PFUJ) secretary general Nasir Zaidi, Awami Workers Party, Dawn’s Employees Union, Amber Rahim Shamsi and a citizen Mohammad Ashfaq Jatt who have challenged these rules, saying they are contrary to the freedom of expression as guaranteed in the Constitution.

According to the petitions, implementation of ‘Removal and Blocking of Unlawful Online Content (Procedure, Oversight and Safeguards), Rules 2020’ will inevitably lead to violation of rights to livelihood and freedom of trade and profession, guaranteed to the citizens under Articles 9 and 18 of the Constitution.

AG to consult petitioners and other stakeholders before taking up the matter with PTA

The petitioners are of the opinion that in the garb of these rules, criticism of the government or the public office-holders had been made a cognisable offence.

While hearing the petitions, IHC Chief Justice Athar Minallah observed the “court feels the government did not consult the stakeholders before promulgating the rules”. In order to safeguard the constitutional provisions that guaranteed the freedom of expression, the consultation should be widespread, he observed.

Attorney General Khalid Jawed Khan assured the court that he would invite all the petitioners and relevant stakeholders to review the rules and he would discuss this with the Pakistan Telecommunication Authority (PTA) following the consultation.

The petitioners have cited the Ministry of Information Technology secretary and PTA chairman as respondents.

AG Khan said, in his opinion, social media could only be restricted in the extreme circumstance.

Justice Minallah appreciating the response of the AG termed it “a fair stance” and advised the petitioners to express their concerns regarding the social media rules in the meeting that the AG would convene.

“Let’s start this with a positive note,” advised the IHC chief justice.

He asked the petitioners to submit their contentions before the attorney general in writing as well. He suggested that besides the petitioners, the Pakistan Bar Council (PBC) should also be consulted on this matter.

Kashif Ali Malik, counsel for the petitioners, requested the court to restrain the government from taking any adverse action till the final adjudication of the petitions.

Justice Minallah, however, remarked that in case of any misuse of the law, the aggrieved party may approach the court for redressal of any grievance with regard to these rules.

The court sought a report from the AG and adjourned further hearing till Feb 26.

Published in Dawn, January 26th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...