ISLAMABAD: The Supreme Court on Friday asked the counsel for Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) leader Hamza Shehbaz to file a plea in the Lahore High Court to seek bail for his client.

The apex court remanded the matter back to the high court with an observation that the Supreme Court could not intervene on issues which had not been discussed in the high court and, therefore, it would only be appropriate if his client approached the high court again and raise the issue of hardship.

Headed by Justice Mushir Alam, a three-judge Supreme Court bench took up an application for grant of bail to Hamza Shehbaz which the latter had filed on April 25, 2020.

At the outset of the proceedings, the Supreme Court inquired from Hamza Shehbaz’s counsel Advocate Amjad Pervez whether he wanted to pursue the matter on merit or on the basis of hardship.

In response, the counsel explained that he had raised the bail plea on the basis of hardship since his client had been behind bars for the last 19 months.

PML-N MPA’s lawyer cites hardship as basis for his client’s decision to move SC

He, however, hastened to add that the issue of hardship had never been raised in the high court since this ground was not applicable then as his client had been arrested quite recently and no reference had been filed by the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) in the accountability court against him.

Moreover, he said, despite claims of causing a loss of Rs7 billion to the exchequer, the NAB reference had only accused his client of causing Rs530 million loss.

Hamza Shehbaz is facing a case relating to money laundering and assets beyond means. He was arrested on June 11, 2019, and is still behind bars.

His application stated that the case against Hamza Shehbaz filed by NAB comprised voluminous record and it proposed 110 prosecution witnesses of which testimonies of three witnesses had been recorded so far.

Hamza Shehbaz had been behind bars for the last 19 months, the application said, adding that his petition for grant of bail pending trial was always a matter that required urgent hearing since it involved his fundamental rights to life, liberty, reputation and fair trial.

In his petition, Hamza Shehbaz also pleaded that he had been made a target of political victimisation by anti-democratic rival political groups, adding that allegations of money laundering and possessing assets disproportionate to his known sources of income were all frivolous.

The petition further contended that continued incarceration of the petitioner was merely a harassment tactic.

Published in Dawn, January 23rd, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

March in Pindi
Updated 26 Nov, 2022

March in Pindi

WITH the chief’s appointment out of the way and the army intent on staying out of politics, the fight is now down...
Tough IMF position
26 Nov, 2022

Tough IMF position

THE IMF has made it clear that Pakistan’s “timely finalisation of the [flood] recovery plan” — the key ...
The youth vote
26 Nov, 2022

The youth vote

PAKISTAN is an overwhelmingly young nation, with about 64pc of the population under 30. Yet our political system has...
Hard reset
Updated 26 Nov, 2022

Hard reset

IT is done. What should have been a routine matter in simpler times had this year become a vortex that seemingly...
Order of precedence
25 Nov, 2022

Order of precedence

IN Pakistan as well as abroad, there are few illusions about who actually calls the shots in this country. This...
Politicised police
25 Nov, 2022

Politicised police

AN important case is being heard at the Supreme Court these days, whose outcome could have a far-reaching impact on ...