LHC suspends sessions court order of case against Babar Azam

Published January 16, 2021
The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman. — Photo courtesy of PCB/File
The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman. — Photo courtesy of PCB/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman.

Justice Asjad Javed Ghural issued the stay order on a petition filed by the cricketer and sought replies from police and the complainant by Feb 8.

Additional District & Sessions Judge Muhammad Naeem the other day had ordered police to record the statement of Hamiza Mukhtar under section 154 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) against Azam and proceed in accordance with law.

The judge observed that serious allegations of miscarriage/abortion and deceitful intercourse on false assurance of marriage etc were levelled against the proposed accused. He further observed that from a bare reading of the application of the petitioner, prima facie commission of a cognizable offense was made out.

The judge directed the Naseerabad station house officer to record the statement of the woman under section 154 of CrPC and proceed strictly in accordance with law. Opposing the sessions court’s order, a counsel for Azam argued before the LHC that the allegations of the complainant were based on mala fide intention and to blackmail the petitioner. He said the complainant had earlier withdrawn the same charges against the petitioner and reached a settlement before the police concerned.

The counsel argued the sessions court passed the impugned order beyond the facts of the case and without applying a judicial mind. He asked the court to set aside the impugned order for being passed against the law.

Published in Dawn, January 16th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
Updated 29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

It is clear that going after militant groups inside Afghanistan unilaterally presents its own set of difficulties.
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...