LHC suspends sessions court order of case against Babar Azam

Published
5
The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman. — Photo courtesy of PCB/File
The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman. — Photo courtesy of PCB/File

LAHORE: The Lahore High Court on Friday suspended operation of an order passed by a sessions court to the Naseerabad police to register a case against Pakistan cricket captain Babar Azam on a complaint of a woman.

Justice Asjad Javed Ghural issued the stay order on a petition filed by the cricketer and sought replies from police and the complainant by Feb 8.

Additional District & Sessions Judge Muhammad Naeem the other day had ordered police to record the statement of Hamiza Mukhtar under section 154 of Criminal Procedure Code (CrPC) against Azam and proceed in accordance with law.

The judge observed that serious allegations of miscarriage/abortion and deceitful intercourse on false assurance of marriage etc were levelled against the proposed accused. He further observed that from a bare reading of the application of the petitioner, prima facie commission of a cognizable offense was made out.

The judge directed the Naseerabad station house officer to record the statement of the woman under section 154 of CrPC and proceed strictly in accordance with law. Opposing the sessions court’s order, a counsel for Azam argued before the LHC that the allegations of the complainant were based on mala fide intention and to blackmail the petitioner. He said the complainant had earlier withdrawn the same charges against the petitioner and reached a settlement before the police concerned.

The counsel argued the sessions court passed the impugned order beyond the facts of the case and without applying a judicial mind. He asked the court to set aside the impugned order for being passed against the law.

Published in Dawn, January 16th, 2021

Opinion

Editorial

Perilous misstep
Updated 12 Oct, 2026

Perilous misstep

If the authorities felt terrorism was increasing in some tribal districts and adjoining areas, they could have limited themselves to imposing a targeted emergency under Article 232.
Import fraud
12 Oct, 2026

Import fraud

THE under-invoicing of imports from China is not an allegation. It is an open secret in Pakistan’s markets — one...
Paralysed prisons
12 Oct, 2026

Paralysed prisons

PAKISTAN’S overcrowded jails distort the intention of imprisonment — rehabilitation, education, and occupational...
Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...