Health dept told to facilitate committee finalising medico-legal SOPs in rape cases

Published November 18, 2020
The Sindh High Court has directed the health department to facilitate in the formation of SOPs for medico-legal cases. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File
The Sindh High Court has directed the health department to facilitate in the formation of SOPs for medico-legal cases. — Photo courtesy Wikimedia Commons/File

KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Tuesday directed the provincial health department to facilitate a recently constituted 15-member medico-legal reforms committee to hold a meeting to finalise the standard operating procedure (SOPs) for medico-legal tests in rape cases.

A two-judge bench headed by Justice Mohammad Ali Mazhar directed the committee to examine the working paper and propose changes, if any, after the chairman of the committee informed the bench that an earlier committee had also submitted detailed proposals for improvising the existing medico-legal system.

While adjourning the hearing till Dec 10, the bench directed the committee to file its report through the health department.

When a petition seeking abolition of virginity tests in rape cases came up for hearing, the chief technical officer of the provincial health department, Dr Faiz Mangi, through a statement signed by the health secretary informed the bench that the medico-legal reforms committee was constituted by the health department on Oct 19.

SHC is informed that the health dept constituted the committee last month

He further submitted that the 15-member committee was being headed by the chairman of the forensic department of the Jinnah Sindh Medical University (JSMU), Prof Dr Farhat Hussain Mirza.

Dr Mirza and additional police surgeon of the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre (JPMC) Dr Summaiya Tariq, also a member of the committee, appeared before the bench during Tuesday’s proceedings.

They informed the bench that they had previously also submitted a detailed proposal for making some improvement in the medico-legal system and proposed some reforms for improving the system and submitted a detailed document.

The bench was further informed that the committee, formed by the health department last month, had not met yet.

Dr Mirza further said that they had no secretarial facility to call all the members for a meeting.

However, Dr Mangi suggested that if the chairman of the committee informed them about the meeting 10 days in advance, then all committee members would be communicated to ensure their presence.

At this, Dr Summaiya submitted that due to the second wave of Covid-19, it was not possible to hold a physical meeting and proposed a virtual meeting.

Before convening the meeting, the bench directed the chief technical officer to supply copy of working paper/proposal to all members of the committee so that they might examine the documents and also propose changes.

After examining the same, Dr Mirza and Dr Summaiya would suggest a date for convening a virtual meeting through Zoom and if circumstances so allowed they may hold a physical meeting for finalising SOPs and submit the same through the health department in court, the bench concluded.

Natasha Ali and other petitioners approached the SHC stating that medico-legal officers were performing hymen and two-finger tests as part of the medical evaluation of sexual assault victims.

They maintained that such tests and standards were unreliable, unnecessary and without any scientific basis and defied the constitutional liberties vesting in and with all citizens, including victims of sexual assaults.

They asked the SHC to issue directives to the home and health departments to end two-finger tests in rape cases, ensure implementation of DNA tests and the SOPs germane to good medical practice as regards medical examinations, investigations and criminal prosecution of allegations in sexual assaults cases.

The petitioner also sought direction for respondents to induct qualified female MLOs duly accredited with modern medical practices.

Published in Dawn, November 18th, 2020

Opinion

Rule by law

Rule by law

‘The rule of law’ is being weaponised, taking on whatever meaning that fits the political objectives of those invoking it.

Editorial

Isfahan strikes
20 Apr, 2024

Isfahan strikes

THE Iran-Israel shadow war has very much come out into the open. Tel Aviv had been targeting Tehran’s assets for...
President’s speech
20 Apr, 2024

President’s speech

PRESIDENT Asif Ali Zardari seems to have managed to hit all the right notes in his address to the joint sitting of...
Karachi terror
20 Apr, 2024

Karachi terror

IS urban terrorism returning to Karachi? Yesterday’s deplorable suicide bombing attack on a van carrying five...
X post facto
Updated 19 Apr, 2024

X post facto

Our decision-makers should realise the harm they are causing.
Insufficient inquiry
19 Apr, 2024

Insufficient inquiry

UNLESS the state is honest about the mistakes its functionaries have made, we will be doomed to repeat our follies....
Melting glaciers
19 Apr, 2024

Melting glaciers

AFTER several rain-related deaths in KP in recent days, the Provincial Disaster Management Authority has sprung into...