LAHORE: Detailed judgment released by a Lahore High Court two-judge bench on post-arrest bail of Jang group editor-in-chief Mir Shakilur Rehman holds the record proved that the petitioner procured valuable property against “exemption policy” by corrupt, dishonest and illegal means in connivance with co-suspects.

The bench comprising Justice Sardar Ahmad Naeem and Justice Farooq Haider had dismissed the bail petition on July 8 through a short order.

Giving reasons to deny bail, the bench observed that in cases of white collar crimes, the primary instrument for commission of crime is the creation of a document, which usually comes to the surface after accomplishment of assignment.

“Such offences are made possible by the use of some form of technical or inside knowledge, which may be an awareness of how to use the organisational routine to conceal offending or may involve the abuse of special expertise,” remarks the bench in its 19-page verdict.

It further remarks that the moral element in white collar crimes is absent and crimes of such nature affect whole society even though they may not have any immediate victims.

It observes that the NAB after thorough investigation concluded that the property transaction in question caused a loss of Rs143 million to public exchequer, recoverable from the petitioner and no evidence was produced by him during investigation showing payment of the outstanding dues.

“Thus, the above incriminating material suggests strong nexus of the petitioner with the above crime, which prima facie constitute corruption and corrupt practices within the meaning of section 9 of National Accountability Ordinance 1999,” rules the bench.

The bench also relies on a Supreme Court’s judgement in Mubashir Hassan’s case (PLD 2010, SC 265), which holds that in cases of white collar crimes pragmatic approach should be adopted by the courts at investigation as well as bail stage and that no leniency should be shown to the people involved in suchlike cases.

The bench further rules that the case law cited by the petitioner’s counsel was distinguishable as facts and circumstances of same are not identical to the instant case.

The NAB in its reference accused Rehman of illegally obtaining exemption of 54 plots each measuring one kanal situated in Block-H, Johar Town. Other two suspects are former director general of Lahore Development Authority Humayon Faiz Rasool and former director of land development department of the LDA Mian Bashir Ahmad.

Published in Dawn, July 11th, 2020

Opinion

Law & processions
16 Oct 2021

Law & processions

It is up to the police to impose reasonable conditions on a procession.
Is the party over?
Updated 16 Oct 2021

Is the party over?

Many in PTI are concerned how they can hang on till the next elections.
The last fortress
Updated 16 Oct 2021

The last fortress

The state wants to use the social media rules to trample on the right to freedom of speech.
Reopening under Covid
15 Oct 2021

Reopening under Covid

It will be a challenge to deal with all students returning to classrooms and maintaining SOPs.

Editorial

Diminishing freedom
Updated 16 Oct 2021

Diminishing freedom

DESPITE the serious reservations of digital rights activists and tech companies, the federal government has...
16 Oct 2021

Dirty politics

IN her outburst against Prime Minister Imran Khan this week, PML-N leader Maryam Nawaz may not have taken names but...
16 Oct 2021

Decreasing emissions

THE announcement by SAPM on Climate Change Malik Amin Aslam that carbon emissions in the country came down by 9pc...
No need for NAB
Updated 15 Oct 2021

No need for NAB

THE National Accountability Bureau has sent instructions to its regional bureaus to stop processing cases that fall...
Forced conversions
Updated 15 Oct 2021

Forced conversions

THE majoritarian view has once again prevailed in the matter of bringing about legislation against forced conversion...
15 Oct 2021

Transgender rights

MEMBERS of the transgender community in the country are often at the receiving end of both their families’ and...