KARACHI: The Sindh High Court on Wednesday set aside the five-year imprisonment handed down to a journalist by a trial court in the case pertaining to possession of hate literature to foment religious disharmony.

An antiterrorism court had sentenced Nasrullah Khan Chaudhry to five years in prison in December and Nasrullah Khan, journalist associated with the Urdu-language daily Nai Baat, through his lawyer challenged the trial court order before the SHC.

After hearing arguments and examining the record and proceedings of the case, the two-judge bench headed by Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi allowed the appeal and overturned the conviction order of the trial court through a short order. The reasons will be recorded later.

Lawyer for the appellant advocate Mohammad Farooq contended that the judgement of the trial court was not in accordance with the basic principles of law and maintained that the Counter-Terrorism Department had kept the appellant in wrongful detention for three days and then framed him in the present case.

The counsel further argued that it was a case of no evidence and even the FIR was not in accordance with law. He asserted that the prosecution did not produce any evidence regarding the recovery of hate literature from the appellant and Section 11-W(i) of the Anti-Terrorism Act was not applicable to the case and pleaded to set aside the conviction.

The additional prosecutor general argued that the prosecution proved its case and asked the court to uphold the trial court’s judgement. He further contended that the appellant was associated with a banned militant organisation.

The ATC had handed down five-year imprisonment to him and imposed a fine under Section 11-W(i) (printing, publishing or disseminating any material to incite hatred or giving projection to any person convicted for a terrorist act or any proscribed organisation or an organisation placed under observation or anyone concerned in terrorism) and six-month term in sections 11-F(i) (a person is guilty of an offence if he belongs or professes to belong to a proscribed organization) of the ATA.

The prosecution maintained in the charge sheet that the senior journalist was arrested on Nov 11, 2018 in the Garden area and claimed that he was carrying some journals and booklets about Afghan jihad, Punjabi Taliban and other books which contained material for getting people instigated on religious grounds and creating religious disharmony as well as encouraging them for jihad.

It also alleged that the journalist had links with Khalid Mukshi, a leader of Al-Qaeda. However, Mukshi was not named as an accused or absconder in the charge sheet.

Published in Dawn, April 9th, 2020

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.