Mourners surround a truck carrying flag-draped coffins of Gen Qassem Soleimani and his comrades in Iran’s south-western city of Ahvaz on Sunday.—AP
Mourners surround a truck carrying flag-draped coffins of Gen Qassem Soleimani and his comrades in Iran’s south-western city of Ahvaz on Sunday.—AP

WASHINGTON: Former US presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama were also offered the option to assassinate Iranian Gen Qassim Soleimani but they “rejected killing him as too provocative,” The New York Times reported on Sunday.

The report did not specify when and why the two former presidents were offered this option, but it did say that Washington has long believed Gen Soleimani was responsible for the deaths of hundreds of American troops in Iraq.

The last time the United States killed a major military leader in a foreign country was during World War II, when the American military shot down the plane carrying the Japanese admiral Isoroku Yamamoto.

The newspaper also reported that US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and Vice President Mike Pence were two of the most hawkish voices arguing for a strong US response to Iran’s growing influence in Iraq.

According to the NYT report, last week top American military officials prepared a list of possible US actions to stop alleged Iran-led violence in Iraq and assassinating Gen Soleimani was one of the options.

“They didn’t think he would take it. In the wars waged since the Sept 11, 2001, attacks, Pentagon officials have often offered improbable options to presidents to make other possibilities appear more palatable,” the newspaper reported, quoting sources in the Pentagon.

“After initially rejecting the Soleimani option on Dec 28 and authorising air strikes on an Iranian-backed Shia militia group instead, a few days later Mr Trump watched, fuming, as television reports showed Iranian-backed attacks on the American Embassy in Baghdad,” the report added.

“By late Thursday, the president had gone for the extreme option. Top Pentagon officials were stunned.”

NYT noted that Mr Trump made the decision “despite disputes in the administration about the significance” of some intelligence reports that Gen Soleimani was planning fresh attacks in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.

“Some (US) officials voiced private skepticism about the rationale for a strike on Gen Soleimani,” noting that intelligence about future Iranian attacks on targets inside Iraq was “thin.”

The report noted that communications between Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Gen Soleimani showed that “the ayatollah had not yet approved any plans by the general for an attack.”

The communications intercepted by the US showed that the “ayatollah had asked Gen Soleimani to come to Tehran for further discussions at least a week before his death.”

Published in Dawn, January 6th, 2020

Opinion

For whom the clock ticks
Updated 22 Apr 2021

For whom the clock ticks

Tarin will have to succeed in order to cement his position within the cabinet.
Ending the ‘forever war’
Updated 21 Apr 2021

Ending the ‘forever war’

Regardless of who the adversary was at any point, two generations of Afghans have known only war.

Editorial

22 Apr 2021

Capping power debt

THE suggested revision in the Circular Debt Management Plan, which aims to cap the flow or addition of new debt to...
22 Apr 2021

Istanbul postponement

WHILE the postponement of the Istanbul peace talks on Afghanistan, which were scheduled to be held later this week,...
22 Apr 2021

No mining precautions

YET another accident caused by a methane gas explosion has been reported from the dangerous coal mines of...
More mishandling
Updated 21 Apr 2021

More mishandling

By its bad decision-making and weak management, the govt has allowed the TLP to garner more importance and heft than it deserves.
21 Apr 2021

Declining FDI

THE sharp decline in FDI in recent months is worrisome. New State Bank data shows that FDI has plummeted by a hefty...
21 Apr 2021

The digital divide

IN the Economist Intelligence Unit’s annual Inclusive Internet Index report, measuring internet inclusion in terms...