THERE are legitimate concerns about the impact that investments coming into Pakistan under the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) will have on the country’s economy.

But the recent intervention by United States Assistant Secretary Alice Wells in this debate only serves to muddy the waters rather than spark a helpful conversation.

As a senior American diplomat, Ms Wells has sometimes been perceived patronising Pakistan.

Her remarks about China-Pakistan Economic Corridor in which she tried to underscore the rising debt burden that Chinese investments are bringing to this country can hardly be expected to ensure progress in the Pakistan-US relationship which itself has undergone a long period of tension.

Should Washington decide to act on Ms Wells’ words, far from yielding any dividends, it will only create more obstacles in bilateral ties.

The concerns being voiced about the growing ties between Pakistan and China by a faction within the Trump administration need more than words before they can be considered credible.

Ms Wells should be asked what the current US administration is willing to do to help Pakistan meet its needs for infrastructure in a way that does not aggravate the country’s debt burden.

If her response is not convincing, then her words will be overshadowed by the ability and willingness of Chinese capital to acquire long-term stakes in this country.

There is no doubt that a more detailed conversation is needed within Pakistan around the growing Chinese stakes in the economy.

The repayment obligations are part of this debate.

In addition, the direction in which these investments will take our economy in the future, particularly in vital areas such as agriculture that is the cradle of our food self-sufficiency, also needs a more sensitive discussion.

But this should first and foremost be a conversation among Pakistani stakeholders, including business leaders, political parties, the research community and the media.

The Trump administration will struggle to find a place in this debate since its input will inevitably be viewed through the prism of its escalating struggle to contain the emergence of China as a great power.

It would be better if the bilateral dialogue between the Pakistan and the US were to focus more on the tangible outcomes that both sides wish to see in Afghanistan, and leave out China and China-Pakistan Economic Corridor until such time that the US has something useful to contribute.

Rao Nauman

Islamabad

Published in Dawn, December 8th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Hasty transition
Updated 05 May, 2024

Hasty transition

Ostensibly, the aim is to exert greater control over social media and to gain more power to crack down on activists, dissidents and journalists.
One small step…
05 May, 2024

One small step…

THERE is some good news for the nation from the heavens above. On Friday, Pakistan managed to dispatch a lunar...
Not out of the woods
05 May, 2024

Not out of the woods

PAKISTAN’S economic vitals might be showing some signs of improvement, but the country is not yet out of danger....
Rigging claims
Updated 04 May, 2024

Rigging claims

The PTI’s allegations are not new; most elections in Pakistan have been controversial, and it is almost a given that results will be challenged by the losing side.
Gaza’s wasteland
04 May, 2024

Gaza’s wasteland

SINCE the start of hostilities on Oct 7, Israel has put in ceaseless efforts to depopulate Gaza, and make the Strip...
Housing scams
04 May, 2024

Housing scams

THE story of illegal housing schemes in Punjab is the story of greed, corruption and plunder. Major players in these...