The PM’s frustration

Published August 24, 2019

IN an interview with The New York Times, Prime Minister Imran Khan said that there was no point in talking to India.

He provided a context to his pronouncement: “…I mean, I have done all the talking. Unfortunately, now when I look back, all the overtures that I was making for peace and dialogue, they took it for appeasement.” Indeed, the overtures have been frequent.

Mr Khan promised to “take two steps if India takes one” in the direction of amity.

He ignored those who opposed his move to release the Indian pilot arrested on Pakistani territory in February.

And in the run-up to the Indian general election this summer, Mr Khan went on to state how a victory at the polls for Prime Minister Narendra Modi would be helpful in finding a resolution to the Kashmir issue.

No doubt, his remarks to the NYT are an expression of his frustration — after all Pakistan’s attempts at improving ties, Mr Modi went ahead and revoked India-held Kashmir’s autonomy and sent in thousands of troops to further silence dissent in the occupied territory.

But while Mr Khan’s disappointment is understandable, it is doubtful whether his decision to drop the idea of talks is sensible.

There are many international examples where negotiations between rival states or territories have solved the most intractable of problems.

Foreclosing any opportunity of dialogue — even in the face of Indian intransigence and brutality — will make things difficult for all, not least the beleaguered Kashmiris to whom Pakistan must lend its full political support.

One hopes this is not his final word on the topic of peace in the region.

It is equally true that there is no room for ‘appeasing’ India, and Pakistan’s battle must follow a clear diplomatic route at world forums, where India’s hubris and atrocities in IHK must be highlighted.

For this, it needs a strong, coherent and consistent strategy, perhaps with input from former diplomats, who have participated in several peace efforts with India without compromising on Pakistan’s vision for Kashmir.

That would be more useful than turning away from the goal itself, ie peace.

The tense situation between the two neighbours has yet again demonstrated how fast relationships deteriorate.

It has shown how quickly the demons crying out for war take over the psyche of even those sitting in positions of power.

The recent statement by an Indian minister irresponsibly hinting at the possible use of the nuclear option by his government is an example of just how fast things can spiral out of control.

Mr Khan warned against the conflict flaring up in his interview to NYT.

It is a grim picture — which is precisely why he must not give up.

Instead, the world must be sent a clear message: Pakistan will work towards regional stability even as it stands by the Kashmiris.

Published in Dawn, August 24th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Wayward ideology
02 Dec, 2022

Wayward ideology

Anyone who claims his legacy for themselves should not treat his words so whimsically.
Progressive stance
02 Dec, 2022

Progressive stance

THE timing of two encouraging developments in the fight against domestic violence in Pakistan could not have been...
China Covid protests
02 Dec, 2022

China Covid protests

PUBLIC protests are rare in China where the People’s Republic maintains order through a strict authoritarian code...
Punjab crisis
01 Dec, 2022

Punjab crisis

ADMINISTRATIVE chaos has ruled Punjab ever since the ouster of the PTI government in April, deepening the...
Quetta attack
01 Dec, 2022

Quetta attack

It would be foolishness of the highest order were the authorities to ignore the emerging threat.
World AIDS Day
01 Dec, 2022

World AIDS Day

AS countries mark World AIDS Day on Dec 1, a timely report from Unicef has renewed concerns about the severe...