No-confidence vote: Other parties 'used' by Fazlur Rehman for his own politics, Faraz regrets

Published August 1, 2019
Leader of the House in the Senate Shibli Faraz addressing a press conference in Islamabad on Thursday. — DawnNewsTV
Leader of the House in the Senate Shibli Faraz addressing a press conference in Islamabad on Thursday. — DawnNewsTV

Leader of the House in the Senate Shibli Faraz, in the aftermath of the shocking outcome on Thursday of the no-trust motion against Chairman Sadiq Sanjrani, said that he regrets that in all this brouhaha major political parties were taken advantage of by JUI-F chief Maulana Fazlur Rehman.

"The opposition's movement has failed. We had said [this would happen] since day one and we met the leaders of the opposition and explained to them that what they are setting out to do is against the prestige of this institution, its stability and is destroying its spirit.

"We went to Maulana Fazlur Rehman's house as part of our cultural tradition of visiting other people's houses to discuss matters. He couldn't help himself and he went ahead and gave a statement which made it seem we had come to seek his help," said Faraz.

"He hasn't even been able to help his own self," he added.

"Despite having no political leverage, he used this no-confidence motion for his own politics and I regret that with this, other major political parties were used," said Faraz.

"They did not realise that what they are setting out to do will ultimately affect their own selves adversely," he said.

He said that the opposition parties undertook the campaign "to save their skins from accountability". He went on to say that Maulana Fazlur Rehman "uses Islam as a shield, whereas the other opposition parties hide from the accountability drive started by the prime minister".

"Our opposition leaders themselves realised [that the vote was wrong] and it is with their support that we rendered the no-trust motion unsuccessful," he said.

He further said that the government has no hard feelings toward the opposition and that both sides have to move forward together to bring in legislation for the benefit of the people.

"This is not just Sadiq Sanjrani's victory, it is the institution's victory," he continued.

Faraz said that not only did the outcome ensure that democracy is stabilised but it did not let the image of the institution be tarnished.

He said that the opposition should now get serious as they have not been elected to simply walk out when there are cases against their leadership. They should help the government help the people.

"The House can only be run if both the opposition and the treasury work together," he emphasised.

The Senate leader hoped that the days to come will prove that this was the first and last time that there was an attempt to destabilise the Senate.

"I hope they have now learnt a lesson," he concluded.

'No horsetrading'

In the interaction with reporters that followed, Faraz rejected the impression that senators had been bought out.

"All senators, whether they are from the opposition or the treasury, are all honourable people. At least for this election, I guarantee [there was no horsetrading]."

He then proceeded to recount the 2015 Senate elections in which Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf had only five members and he had been fielded as the party's candidate for the post of deputy chairman of the Senate.

"That day we were not even aware of the Senate's geography. The PTI candidate still obtained 19 votes that day. Will you call this horsetrading? Will you call this being a sell out?"

"I had no right to inquire how I had obtained those 19 votes. This also depends on the candidate."

As things got heated, a reporter interjected to ask, "Will Shibli Faraz ever vote against the party?"

To this, the Senate leader unequivocally responded with: "Shibli Faraz will never vote against the party. But, if you are saying these people were bought out [...] you can not say such things when the sanctity of the Senate was restored."

"You can say there was a disagreement with the party. This is a secret vote. You should also give me an explanation for those 19 votes, the kind of questions you are raising. We were five senators and we did not even know anyone. First explain those 19 votes to me and the public and then ask such questions."

Cowardly behaviour by 'champions of democracy'

Meanwhile, the government's spokesperson, Firdous Ashiq Awan, regretted the behaviour demonstrated by the opposition when they walked out during the no-confidence vote against Senate Deputy Chairman Saleem Mandviwalla.

"We completed a democratic process with the counting having taken place before the cameras [...] senators voted with their conscience and through a secret ballot rendered the no-trust notion against chairman Senate unsuccessful.

"As soon the process for the next movement began, the 'champions of democracy', tainted it with an ugly stain and instead of letting the voting process continue and granting senators their fundamental right of voting, the opposition again exposed their true faces in front of the people," said Awan.

"Victory and defeat is part of the beauty of democracy but throwing a spanner in the works, the way they sabotaged the process and abstained from participating with only five voters coming in to vote shows us the opposition's foolishness.

"They have already weakened the institution with their foolish behaviour and attempted to bring about an outcome of their own accord. They boycotted the movement knowing full well they will be sorely defeated," she said.

She asked why they didn't "face the vote" and called upon the media to raise the question that if a vote can take place in one no-trust motion and if the government casts a ballot in favour of its own candidate against whom the movement is launched, and does not stop it, then why when there was voting taking place against their own deputy chairman the opposition demonstrated such cowardly behaviour.

"This proves that they do not hold democracy dear or institutions, or hold the Constitution or law sacred. They are only interested in their own person, their own benefit, their own assets and properties," she said.

"The NRO-seeking Fazlur Rehman who had claimed that the government had come to him with an offer [to him I will say]:

"Maulana sahib all your senators expressed no-confidence in your policies today, and did a suicide attack on them and rejected your narrative in an overwhelming manner."

"Therefore you should seek penance and take back the 'October call'. It will see the same result as today."



More pledges
Updated 25 May, 2024

More pledges

There needs to be continuity in economic policies, while development must be focused on bringing prosperity to the masses.
Pemra overreach
25 May, 2024

Pemra overreach

IT seems, at best, a misguided measure and, at worst, an attempt to abuse regulatory power to silence the media. A...
Enduring threat
25 May, 2024

Enduring threat

THE death this week of journalist Nasrullah Gadani, who succumbed to injuries after being attacked by gunmen, is yet...
IMF’s unease
Updated 24 May, 2024

IMF’s unease

It is clear that the next phase of economic stabilisation will be very tough for most of the population.
Belated recognition
24 May, 2024

Belated recognition

WITH Wednesday’s announcement by three European states that they intend to recognise Palestine as a state later...
App for GBV survivors
24 May, 2024

App for GBV survivors

GENDER-based violence is caught between two worlds: one sees it as a crime, the other as ‘convention’. The ...