Justice Isa

Published June 9, 2019

I DO not understood why a mountain has been made o f a mole hill by the legal fraternity and opposition regarding the reference sent to the Supreme Judicial Council (SJC) against Justice Qazi Faez Isa.

This action is entirely within the ambit of the constitution. There is, however, hardly any doubt that Justice Isa enjoys an excellent reputation and is considered above board morally and ethically; nevertheless he is after all a human being and not an angel. To err is human.

In the end, it may all be an honest oversight. Before canonising someone, remember that even saints were not saints at one time, and had to undergo harsh scrutiny. The higher the pedestal, the greater the accountability. Have we forgotten the extreme scrutiny that Justice Kavanaugh went during his confirmation? I am sure the judge himself would welcome all steps as long as they are in line with the constitution, for institutions should not be sacrificed at the altar of hero-worship.

I humbly urge the naysayers to hold their horses and wait for the decision of the SJC, which, after all, is made up of senior most judges. Who better to judge a judge than his own peers?

For the legal fraternity to condemn this reference, which is in line with the Articles of the Constitution, is to condemn the constitution itself, which I am sure no lawyer, law officer, Bar Council, or even the judges themselves can think of.

Here, may I also add that with the severe punishment meted out to senior officers of the army, the myth of holy cows will be buried once and for all.

Dr Raza Gardezi

Karachi

(2)

WHILE news of protest by bar associations has been emerging from all across the country in favour of Justice Qazi Faez Isa, and especially the words and tone used by the Supreme Court Bar Association, it feels so painful to find that whenever voice is raised for accountability in some department, agitations starts.

In this particular case, I would like to ask the concerned and non-concerned (so-called saviours of judicial system): are they sincere to Pakistan?

If the said judge is pious and not guilty, let the Supreme Judicial Council decide his fate. No one is and should be above law.

Dr Hassan Jamil Sandhu

Gujranwala

Published in Dawn, June 9th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Business concerns
Updated 26 Apr, 2024

Business concerns

There is no doubt that these issues are impeding a positive business clime, which is required to boost private investment and economic growth.
Musical chairs
26 Apr, 2024

Musical chairs

THE petitioners are quite helpless. Yet again, they are being expected to wait while the bench supposed to hear...
Global arms race
26 Apr, 2024

Global arms race

THE figure is staggering. According to the annual report of Sweden-based think tank Stockholm International Peace...
Digital growth
Updated 25 Apr, 2024

Digital growth

Democratising digital development will catalyse a rapid, if not immediate, improvement in human development indicators for the underserved segments of the Pakistani citizenry.
Nikah rights
25 Apr, 2024

Nikah rights

THE Supreme Court recently delivered a judgement championing the rights of women within a marriage. The ruling...
Campus crackdowns
25 Apr, 2024

Campus crackdowns

WHILE most Western governments have either been gladly facilitating Israel’s genocidal war in Gaza, or meekly...