Model courts

Published April 10, 2019

ACCORDING to Article 37 (d) of the Constitution, every citizen of the state has the right to “inexpensive and expeditious” justice. And yet, one of the foremost grievances against the legal system in this country is its sheer lethargy, resulting in a massive backlog of cases, many of which are described as ‘frivolous’ by litigators who say these will never be resolved, wasting precious time and resources in the process. At the beginning of the year, an estimated 1.9m cases awaited the new chief justice, Asif Saeed Khosa, who had said he wanted to build “... a dam against undue and unnecessary delays in judicial determination of cases”. He proposed the setting up of model courts in every district of the country to conduct daily trials on murder and narcotics-related cases (for now). The idea of model courts, as they exist today, was first introduced by him. The courts were under the supervision of Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, albeit restricted to Punjab. Unlike the district courts, which suffer from budgetary constraints, model courts have greater administrative and technological facilities. They deliver verdicts under an agreed timeline, without adjournment. Additionally, a monitoring and evaluation cell under the command of the chief justice or chairman of the National Judicial (Policy Making) Committee reviews the workings of the courts every two months.

While all this sounds commendable in theory — and model courts have indeed had success in parts of the country — introducing them across Pakistan will present its own set of challenges, particularly when we remember Chief Justice Khosa’s own complaint about the lack of judges in the country. There is also a fear that, if not handled carefully, model courts may eventually devolve into a parallel legal system, as opposed to remaining a complementary one. Lastly, despite the maxim that justice delayed is justice denied, ‘speedy justice’ can be misused as a cover for denying a fair trial. In the quick dispensation of ‘justice’, due process must still be ensured.

Published in Dawn, April 10th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

‘Source of terror’
Updated 29 Mar, 2024

‘Source of terror’

It is clear that going after militant groups inside Afghanistan unilaterally presents its own set of difficulties.
Chipping in
29 Mar, 2024

Chipping in

FEDERAL infrastructure development schemes are located in the provinces. Most such projects — for instance,...
Toxic emitters
29 Mar, 2024

Toxic emitters

IT is concerning to note that dozens of industries have been violating environmental laws in and around Islamabad....
Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...