IT would be comical — if it weren’t for the fact that it so perfectly encapsulates how shrunken the space for free speech and expression in Pakistan now truly is. More alarming still is the seeming enthusiasm of civil authorities to take a page out of the fascist’s playbook to hasten the demise of civil liberties.

The notification of an inquiry — lodged by the FIA’s cybercrime wing citing a directive from the interior ministry — against several journalists and groups for participating in a “targeted social media campaign” to criticise the Saudi crown prince during his recent visit to Pakistan has been decried and derided in equal parts since it came to light. Even officials within the ministry and FIA have expressed confusion about how to proceed, since there is (as yet) no statute under which to prosecute citizens for expressing solidarity with and sharing images of slain journalists such as Jamal Khashoggi.

Whether or not the FIA is merely rubber-stamping, it points to an increasing misuse of the investigatory body as a literal thought police to control and silence online voices, which dovetails with a general escalation in abuses of power to gag the press and curtail fundamental rights of free speech, expression and information.

It is even more puzzling since only days prior to the delegation’s February visit, another circular issued by the ministry alluding to “nefarious interests” keen on “maligning” the Saudi prince was leaked — and denounced by the minister of state for interior, who said that the government was investigating the matter “as per the directives” of the prime minister.

While the findings of that probe have yet — if ever — to be shared, the fact that no official wishes to claim the animus for either this or the resurrected attempt to target independent and critical voices is positively Kafkaesque. With truth so much stranger than fiction, perhaps it is futile — even dangerous — to demand who really is behind Pakistan’s draconian descent, with all its attendant absurdities. 

Published in Dawn, March 30th, 2019

Opinion

Editorial

Failed martial law
Updated 05 Dec, 2024

Failed martial law

Appetite for non-democratic systems of governance appears to be shrinking rapidly. Perhaps more countries are now realising the futility of rule by force.
Holding the key
05 Dec, 2024

Holding the key

IN the view of one learned judge of the Supreme Court’s recently formed constitutional bench, parliament holds the...
New low
05 Dec, 2024

New low

WHERE does one go from here? In the latest blow to women’s rights in Afghanistan, the Taliban regime has barred...
Online oppression
Updated 04 Dec, 2024

Online oppression

Plan to bring changes to Peca is simply another attempt to suffocate dissent. It shows how the state continues to prioritise control over real cybersecurity concerns.
The right call
04 Dec, 2024

The right call

AMIDST the ongoing tussle between the federal government and the main opposition party, several critical issues...
Acting cautiously
04 Dec, 2024

Acting cautiously

IT appears too big a temptation to ignore. The wider expectations for a steeper reduction in the borrowing costs...