CJP displeased with lack of liver transplant facility for 70 years

Published December 3, 2018
"If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?" asks Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar. ─ File photo
"If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?" asks Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar. ─ File photo

LAHORE: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar on Sunday expressed displeasure over non-availability of complete infrastructure for liver transplant.

“If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?” he questioned.

At the Supreme Court’s Lahore registry, the CJP was heading a two-member bench hearing a suo motu case of alleged irregularities in the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute (PKLI). PKLI head Dr Sajid, former chief executive officer Dr Saeed Akhtar, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Lahore Director General Shehzad Saleem and others were present in the court.

Dr Sajid told the court that currently, it was not possible for them to provide liver transplant facility to children.

“We cannot endanger the lives of children, and majority of people cannot afford the treatment from neighbouring countries,” he said, expressing concern. “What will happen to the children who are suffering from this disease?”

The CJP asked the Punjab advocate general if he filed a corruption reference against those involved in spending Rs34 billion and yet not providing the transplant facility. “It was the collective responsibility of the doctors community to launch a campaign for liver transplant,” he asserted.

The CJP said a social media campaign had been launched against the court when he had questioned former PKLI head Dr Akhtar, and asked him who had suggested setting up of a liver facility to them.

Dr Akhtar told the court that former chief minister Shahbaz Sharif had cited an example of a hospital in New York from where he (Shahbaz) had received treatment.

The CJP said that he knew who had given the idea and where it was first discussed, and adjourned the hearing till Dec 3 (today) in Islamabad.

Published in Dawn, December 3rd, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...