CJP displeased with lack of liver transplant facility for 70 years

"If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?" asks Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar. ─ File photo
"If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?" asks Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar. ─ File photo

LAHORE: Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar on Sunday expressed displeasure over non-availability of complete infrastructure for liver transplant.

“If India can start liver transplant then why did Pakistan not build such a facility in the last 70 years?” he questioned.

At the Supreme Court’s Lahore registry, the CJP was heading a two-member bench hearing a suo motu case of alleged irregularities in the Pakistan Kidney and Liver Institute (PKLI). PKLI head Dr Sajid, former chief executive officer Dr Saeed Akhtar, National Accountability Bureau (NAB) Lahore Director General Shehzad Saleem and others were present in the court.

Dr Sajid told the court that currently, it was not possible for them to provide liver transplant facility to children.

“We cannot endanger the lives of children, and majority of people cannot afford the treatment from neighbouring countries,” he said, expressing concern. “What will happen to the children who are suffering from this disease?”

The CJP asked the Punjab advocate general if he filed a corruption reference against those involved in spending Rs34 billion and yet not providing the transplant facility. “It was the collective responsibility of the doctors community to launch a campaign for liver transplant,” he asserted.

The CJP said a social media campaign had been launched against the court when he had questioned former PKLI head Dr Akhtar, and asked him who had suggested setting up of a liver facility to them.

Dr Akhtar told the court that former chief minister Shahbaz Sharif had cited an example of a hospital in New York from where he (Shahbaz) had received treatment.

The CJP said that he knew who had given the idea and where it was first discussed, and adjourned the hearing till Dec 3 (today) in Islamabad.

Published in Dawn, December 3rd, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Quid pro quo
Updated 26 Jul, 2026

Quid pro quo

Accepting Israel would mean legitimising its violence against the Palestinians, as well as its neighbouring Arab states and Iran.
AI in government
26 Jul, 2026

AI in government

THE Prime Minister’s Office has announced the introduction of an AI-powered digital system and directed ministries...
Cautious optimism
26 Jul, 2026

Cautious optimism

THE latest polio surveillance figures offer some encouraging news regarding the difficult fight against polio. The...
Rampant lawlessness
Updated 25 Jul, 2026

Rampant lawlessness

THE brutal slaying of a judge and his guard in Mastung is the latest in a series of blood-drenched events that have...
Daily fuel pricing
25 Jul, 2026

Daily fuel pricing

THE government’s move to daily petroleum price adjustments should make fuel pricing more transparent and more...
The drug problem
25 Jul, 2026

The drug problem

WHILE Islamabad Police chase low-level peddlers, the capital’s kingpins have quietly taken their operations ...