SC accepts apologies from Jang, The News representatives for 'misreporting' CJP's remarks

Published
15
Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar had distanced himself from the 'misreported' remarks. ─ DawnNewsTV
Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar had distanced himself from the 'misreported' remarks. ─ DawnNewsTV

The Supreme Court (SC) on Thursday accepted the unconditional apologies tendered by representatives of two news publications for 'misreporting' Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar's remarks yesterday.

Urdu newspaper Jang and English daily The News had in their lead stories on Wednesday reported that CJP Nisar, while hearing a suo motu case of illegal construction in Banigala, had "remarked that the current government lacked capability and planning".

The top judge had distanced himself from those remarks, explaining that the court had been referring to the Capital Development Authority in the Banigala case, not the government, and issued notices to the publications.

A three-judge bench headed by the CJP held a hearing on the notices today.

Jang Editor Hanif Khalid, who was present in court, was asked by Justice Nisar to explain how his remarks were misreported and published, and then debated on television later that night.

"Your reporter does not even come to court. You want institutions to clash with each other," the CJP remarked, adding that incorrect remarks were attributed to him.

"Are we sitting here to harm institutions?" he asked.

Justice Ijazul Ahsan said: "Why is it only your organisation that misreports stories? You report the news wrong and then join your hands in forgiveness the next day."

Justice Ijaz also observed that the Jang reporter had not been present in court, to which Khalid responded that the reporter had been handed his fifth notice.

"I seek unconditional pardon," the editor added.

The News' senior court report Sohail Khan also appeared in court today. He told the judges he had been reporting on court affairs for 15 years.

"This news was first aired on all TV channels," he said, adding that he had complaints with the matter and that he had reported it accurately.

The court set aside its notice after receiving the apologies and cautioned both publications to be more responsible with their reporting in the future.

Opinion

Editorial

Without consequence
Updated 02 Nov, 2026

Without consequence

From drone attacks to online harassment and legal intimidation, the methods of silencing reporters are multiplying, with little fear of punishment.
Climate diagnosis
02 Nov, 2026

Climate diagnosis

THE Lancet Countdown’s latest findings should change how Pakistan thinks about illness as much as how it thinks...
Fighting harassment
02 Nov, 2026

Fighting harassment

WORKPLACE harassment is often narrowly defined as sexual misconduct. A resolution passed by the National Assembly on...
Cost of provinces
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cost of provinces

Political parties demanding new provinces must explain how they intend to pay for them and what improvements citizens can expect.
Exchange hack
01 Nov, 2026

Exchange hack

ON Thursday, the largest cryptocurrency heist in history saw some $6.3bn drained from exchange platform Binance’s...
Cyber safety
Updated 01 Nov, 2026

Cyber safety

The state of freedom of expression in Pakistan is already quite poor, so any further attempts to clamp down on free speech must be resisted.