A MOMENT of truth seems to be rapidly approaching for the PTI government. The managing director of the International Monetary Fund said clearly that the fund will expect “absolute transparency about the nature, size, and terms of the debt that is bearing on a particular country”, and although she did not explicitly mention China in her remarks, they were given directly in response to a question about Pakistan’s stockpile of Chinese debt.

The transparency must extend to “the extent and composition of that debt,” she added, whether it was government-owned or by state-owned enterprises “or the like of it”, which presumably means it also includes private-sector debt.

The government representatives enjoy giving the figure of $95 billion as the total size of Pakistan’s external debt in their public remarks in an attempt to impress upon us all the sheer size of the debt mountain they have inherited.

Since this figure includes bank borrowing and other private-sector debt, we can see this repeated mention of it as a sign that all debt, whether private or public, has a bearing on Pakistan’s external debt sustainability.

If the IMF indeed insists on disclosure of the “extent and composition” of all debt, including CPEC related, then the government has an obligation to ensure that such details are also shared with parliament and the State Bank of Pakistan. The government and the IMF cannot keep the details of these future liabilities, that have a direct bearing on the country’s external debt sustainability, as a private matter purely between themselves.

At the moment, even the State Bank does not have these details and has to compile its own debt sustainability forecasts on the basis of whatever open information there is, meaning the curator of the country’s foreign exchange reserves is left to draw external debt sustainability forecasts on the basis of informed guesswork.

Even the payment mechanism involved in the Chinese projects were not known to the State Bank, resulting in a significant under-reporting of imports from China because many of the payments were not routed through this country’s banking system.

The PTI leadership, while in opposition, made strong demands for full disclosure of all CPEC deals, as well as the LNG deal.

In their early days in power they repeated their commitment to follow through on their promise to disclose both of these. But today they are backtracking from this commitment.

If their hands are tied through legal covenants that prohibit disclosure, then surely these also apply to the sharing of such details with the IMF.

It would be unacceptable to have a situation where the government and the IMF are both in on the details of these important deals, while the people of Pakistan and the State Bank are left to guess what the future holds for them.

Published in Dawn, October 13th, 2018

Opinion

Eid and money
Updated 13 May 2021

Eid and money

Why is a thing more real when you can touch, taste or feel it as opposed to something that is only experienced?
On whose side?
13 May 2021

On whose side?

Ambassadors strive to ‘well-serve’ their country.

Editorial

Eid during Covid
Updated 13 May 2021

Eid during Covid

It is indisputable that our actions now will prevent matters from becoming far worse.
13 May 2021

Foreign policy gaffes

MIXED messages, retractions and clarifications from the government have become an all-too-common occurrence when it...
13 May 2021

Zimbabwe series win

PAKISTAN’S crushing innings victories over Zimbabwe in the two Tests were a befitting end to their highly...
PM’s Saudi visit
Updated 12 May 2021

PM’s Saudi visit

It is very important that Pakistan take no step, or agree to any demand, that can have an adverse effect on national sovereignty.
12 May 2021

A new intifada?

THE situation in the occupied territories over the past few days has been incendiary, with tensions boiling over as...
Updated 12 May 2021

SOP violations

ON Monday, Sindh Police officials were given a well-deserved slap on the wrist by a judicial magistrate in Karachi...