PHC suspends conviction by military court

Published
0

PESHAWAR: A Peshawar High Court bench on Monday stayed execution of a militant and suspended the death sentence awarded to him by a military court on account of attacking security forces which had resulted in death of some personnel.

The bench comprising Justice Ishtiaq Ibrahim and Justice Abdul Shakoor issued notices to the ministries of defence and interior and sought record of the case after preliminary arguments in a writ petition filed by a resident of Swat, Ameer Rehman, challenging the conviction of his son, Nadir Khan.

The bench fixed Oct 3 for next hearing.

The petitioner claimed that his son was innocent and was falsely implicated in the cases mentioned by the Inter Services Public Relations (ISPR), the media wing of Pakistan Army, against him.

He alleged that his son was taken into custody in 2009 and had remained a missing person and now they came to know that he was convicted by a military court.

The ISPR in a press release issued on May 5 announced the conviction of 11 ‘hardcore terrorists’ by the military courts, including the present detainee, and confirmation of their sentences by the army chief.

The ISPR had stated that the convict was a member of proscribed organisation. It was added that he was involved in attacking armed forces of Pakistan which had resulted in death of Havaldar Mohammad Ismail along with a soldier.

It was claimed that he was also found in possession of fire-arms and explosives. The ISPR stated that the convict had confessed his offences before the judicial magistrate and the trial court.

Advocate Furqan Khan Yousafzai appeared for the petitioner and said his client had surrendered to the security forces at Shah Dehri area in Swat in 2009 and was shifted to unknown location after which he had remained incommunicado.

He claimed that on Sept 13 his family members met him at Kohat Internment Centre where he told his father that he had been convicted by a military court and was sentenced to death.

He argued that the detainee was not given a fair trial. He questioned how he could be tried by the military court when the occurrences had taken place many years before the setting up of these courts.

Published in Dawn, September 25th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Makkah agreement
09 Aug, 2026

Makkah agreement

IN the midst of a gruelling war between the US and Iran — currently at a stalemate — the signing of the Makkah...
Conflicting priorities
09 Aug, 2026

Conflicting priorities

THERE is a reasonable argument that the democratic process must go on regardless of prevailing conditions; that...
FIFA controversy
09 Aug, 2026

FIFA controversy

FIFA PRESIDENT Gianni Infantino is at the centre of a storm of his own making. Even after a crisis meeting in...
Danger ahead
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Danger ahead

PAKISTAN has already paid a heavy human price this monsoon, even as another dangerous spell approaches. NDMA figures...
Israeli impunity
08 Aug, 2026

Israeli impunity

ANY hope that Hamas’s decision to disarm would lead to a breakthrough has been dashed for one simple reason:...
Flawed investigations
Updated 08 Aug, 2026

Flawed investigations

An inaccurate record of a victim’s wounds hinders the dispensation of justice. Medical examiners in such a critical area cannot cut corners.