Twitter shutdown?

Published August 17, 2018

THE spectre of an internet clampdown has once again reared its ugly head. In a recent Senate body meeting, a PTA representative stated the possibility that Twitter could be banned in Pakistan if it ignored an Islamabad High Court notice to comply with requests to block “certain offensive material” from its platform. We have been at this juncture before; then, as now, this practice is ultimately self-defeating, not least because website bans can easily be circumvented with VPNs. Trying to “teach Twitter a lesson” may or may not work, but it will certainly have an impact on its over 3m users in Pakistan — including almost all political parties and many public institutions, local businesses and start-ups, and social activists — all of whom rely heavily on the platform. This is not to say that Twitter is without fault; its policies are frequently criticised for allowing hate speech and abuse to proliferate with little checks — but no country that purports to stand for democratic values would suggest resorting to a blanket ban. Indeed, the flippant remark that Twitter is essentially expendable by virtue of its relatively small local presence betrays an inability to appropriately measure the need to tackle illegal online activity against the greater responsibility of upholding the people’s constitutional rights to information, free speech and expression. Blocking any social media platform would violate this mandate.

Amidst the furore, it is important not to ignore another disquieting suggestion made at the meeting. Stating that it cannot adequately investigate and prosecute cybercrimes under the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act, 2017, the FIA asked that it be amended so that the authority can conduct arrests, searches and seizures without court-ordered warrants — essentially a demand for carte blanche. This, too, would be an unreasonable curtailment of citizens’ rights. Peca is problematic, but not because it is too onerous for the authorities. By its design, Peca allows for mission creep, and as such implies bad faith. Much of its language is vague and subject to arbitrary interpretation. In the two years since it was passed, its rules have yet to be finalised. Transparency matters; the people have a right to know what constitutes ‘objectionable content’, not just to avoid inadvertently breaking the law but also to constructively scrutinise it and demand safeguards against state overreach. Hopefully, the PTI will keep its promises to undo this culture of secrecy, and fight for free speech, now that it is in office.

Published in Dawn, August 17th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

1971 in retrospect
Updated 28 Nov, 2022

1971 in retrospect

The point of no return came when the military launched Operation Searchlight in March 1971.
Gender-based violence
28 Nov, 2022

Gender-based violence

IT is a war without boundaries and seemingly without end. A UN report on femicide released on Nov 25, the...
Battle against dacoits
28 Nov, 2022

Battle against dacoits

THE Punjab police is clearly fighting a formidable, and so far losing, battle against the criminal gangs based in ...
Policy rate hike
Updated 27 Nov, 2022

Policy rate hike

The decision to hike the policy rate by 100bps is a step in the right direction, even if intended to appease the IMF.
Vawda’s reprieve
27 Nov, 2022

Vawda’s reprieve

FAISAL Vawda should be relieved. After years of running from a reckoning for submitting a false declaration in his...
Gujarat’s ghosts
27 Nov, 2022

Gujarat’s ghosts

TWO decades have passed since the bloody Gujarat riots, one of the worst spasms of anti-Muslim violence witnessed in...