Why take sides?

Published
62

It is a dispute that Pakistan can and should have stayed out of, or at the very least waded into sensibly and with diplomatic tact.

Instead, a one-sided position has been taken that makes Pakistan look weak and may introduce wrinkles in a relationship with a friendly Western country.

Saudi Arabia’s disproportionate response to arguably clumsy attempts by Canada to highlight human rights violations in the former country is a lesson in how not to conduct bilateral relations. For Pakistan, however, the choice was more straightforward: hew to previous formulations of neutrality in bilateral disputes between friends and allies, and avoid getting entangled in a dispute where the country had little to gain and much to lose.

The caretaker administration is to hand over the reins of government to the PTI for the first time in a few days’ time — a manifestly valid reason for postponing a policy decision until the new government finds its feet. But for reasons that the caretaker government has not made clear, it has chosen to side with Saudi Arabia in its dispute with Canada.

Perhaps an argument can be made that Saudi Arabia is on the diplomatic warpath and with Pakistan suffering acute pressure on the external account front, the possibility of financial aid, oil imports on preferential terms and sustaining crucial foreign remittances from Saudi Arabia has meant having to choose sides.

See: Saudi-backed IsDB ready to help Imran-led govt with $4 billion loan

But Pakistan has not overtly taken sides in the Saudi Arabia-led Gulf embargo against Qatar, and prime minister-elect Imran Khan has pledged to try and ease tensions between Saudi Arabia and Iran. Surely, the Saudi-Iran and Saudi-Qatar differences are of far greater importance to Saudi Arabia than its dispute with Canada.

For Pakistan to so unnecessarily align itself against Canada is also to disregard trade relations and diplomatic ties with a friendly Western power and the thousands of Canadians of Pakistani origin. Better sense ought to have prevailed. Pakistan should maintain neutrality and promote peaceful relations wherever it can.

Published in Dawn, August 11th, 2018

Opinion

Editorial

Farewell to arms?
Updated 03 Aug, 2026

Farewell to arms?

PALESTINIAN resistance group Hamas recently made a major concession by agreeing to give up its weapons. It should be...
Unplanned future
03 Aug, 2026

Unplanned future

A PROJECTION that Pakistan’s population could reach 400m by 2040 should not be treated as another dramatic number...
No more torture
03 Aug, 2026

No more torture

EVEN the best laws on the books are worth little unless the state shows the willingness to enforce them. This is...
Urban flooding
Updated 02 Aug, 2026

Urban flooding

THE warning from the disaster management and weather authorities that a new monsoon spell could trigger urban...
Fatal workplaces
02 Aug, 2026

Fatal workplaces

THE methane explosion near Quetta that killed 34 coal miners is the latest entry in Pakistan’s long register of...
Dual standards
02 Aug, 2026

Dual standards

IT appears that the Pakhtunkhwa Milli Awami Party has fallen foul of the Election Commission of Pakistan. A...