CJP vows to 'protect democracy', rejects accusations judiciary acting as 'part of a plan'

Published February 3, 2018
Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar addresses a meeting of the National Judicial Policy Making Committee. — Screengrab
Chief Justice of Pakistan Mian Saqib Nisar addresses a meeting of the National Judicial Policy Making Committee. — Screengrab

Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Mian Saqib Nisar — apparently in response to ousted prime minister Nawaz Sharif's recent accusations of judicial complicity in past coups — on Saturday vowed to "protect" democracy while reiterating that the Doctrine of Necessity had been "buried".

"I will not be staying [on this post] if democracy is ever derailed [in the country]," he declared while addressing a meeting of high court and federal judges.

"We [the judiciary] are being accused of accepting some cases, of being a part of an anti-democracy campaign, but the judges must not come under any pressure," he said.

"The judiciary is not part of any 'planning' and we will not let anyone suffer from injustice," he added.

Conceding that the judiciary had "made some mistakes in the past", the chief justice said that in order to move forward, the institution will have to hold itself accountable as well.

While stressing the importance of dispensing justice that "satisfies the public". Justice Nisar urged the judges to regard their legal profession with passion instead of considering it a mere job.

"We are the highest paid government servants in this country," he said. "We are part of this nation... So we must deliver."

He added that since the judiciary is an important pillar of the state, judges must ensure that justice is served as quickly as possible. He also insisted that judges must "become a part of the campaign to take the nation forward".

Speaking on the need for judges to be clear-eyed when making decisions, the chief justice once again resorted to Punjabi colloquialisms to explain his viewpoint.

"It is true that you should have a good home and peace of mind," he began. "A Supreme Court friend of mine — whose name I will not take — told me that he stopped fighting his buddhi [wife] the day he became a judge."

Chief justice speaks on the need for clear-eyed decision making.

"I was a little surprised, so I asked him: why? He said, 'Because how can I provide justice if I am not at peace mentally!'" the justice quipped.

"So you need to get rid of stress — and that should not be hard as I am sure most of your wives are nice — because under stress, you will not be able to pass good judgements," he advised.

Defending suo motu notices

Defending the multiple cases that have been registered in the Supreme Court since he started taking suo motu notices, Justice Nisar said that he had never tried to exceed his authority. The only reason behind taking a suo motu notice of certain issues, he explained, was to ensure that the basic rights of the citizens are protected. He then appealed to the judges to never let any emotion influence their verdicts.

"The judiciary is independent, our verdicts should be independent as well," Justice Nisar said.

There is no difference between a judge of a lower court and the chief justice, he said. Judges can only be distinguished from their peers by the "level of attention" they pay to details of the cases they hear, before passing verdicts, the CJP declared.

The CJP admitted that the judiciary was facing numerous challenges but urged everyone in the legal profession to do the best they can in the given circumstances.

Referring to a meeting he had with China's chief justice, Justice Nisar said that the secret behind China's rapid progress is that the citizens worked for their nation. He encouraged the judges to work towards building a better future for the coming generations.

"No one can stop a nation that has good leaders and a strong justice system from progressing."

The CJP lauded the tribunal court judges, saying that he values and respects them just as much as those in the "mainstream".

"Tribunal judges should not consider themselves ignored," he said.

Opinion

Editorial

Judiciary’s SOS
Updated 28 Mar, 2024

Judiciary’s SOS

The ball is now in CJP Isa’s court, and he will feel pressure to take action.
Data protection
28 Mar, 2024

Data protection

WHAT do we want? Data protection laws. When do we want them? Immediately. Without delay, if we are to prevent ...
Selling humans
28 Mar, 2024

Selling humans

HUMAN traders feed off economic distress; they peddle promises of a better life to the impoverished who, mired in...
New terror wave
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

New terror wave

The time has come for decisive government action against militancy.
Development costs
27 Mar, 2024

Development costs

A HEFTY escalation of 30pc in the cost of ongoing federal development schemes is one of the many decisions where the...
Aitchison controversy
Updated 27 Mar, 2024

Aitchison controversy

It is hoped that higher authorities realise that politics and nepotism have no place in schools.