ISLAMABAD: The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf (PTI) has said that the government, and not the Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) or the Supreme Court (SC), is authorised to hold investigations into the foreign funding case against the party.

Talking to Dawn after the hearing of the case by the ECP on Tuesday, PTI spokesman Fawad Chaudhry said the party was ready to submit the details of its accounts to the interior ministry in accordance with the laws, but would not provide them to the ECP.

He said that under the Representation of the People Act 1976 and the Political Parties Order, only the federal government had the power to investigate the party funds.

Party again refuses to submit details of accounts to ECP

He responded in the affirmative when asked if the PTI would submit the details of its accounts to the ministry headed by Chaudhry Nisar Ali Khan.

The PTI leader said the party had received funds from American and other overseas Pakistanis and they could not be considered foreigners. He said the government wanted to use the shoulders of the ECP and the judges to get the overseas Pakistanis declared as “foreigners” and the PTI would not allow the PML-N to do so. Moreover, he said, the accounts of the PTI before the 2013 general elections were in question. He said the ECP was asking for the details which the party had already submitted before it at the time of the elections and the commission had put them on its website after an audit.

Replying to a question, Mr Chaudhry said the party would submit all the documents to the Supreme Court, which was also hearing a similar case.

Earlier in the day, the PTI again refused to submit the details of its accounts and funds to the ECP, telling the bench headed by Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) retired Justice Sardar Muhammad Raza that it had challenged the commission’s decision before the Islamabad High Court (IHC).

During the hearing of the foreign funding case, the PTI’s lawyer informed the ECP that party chairman Imran Khan had filed a writ petition in the IHC, seeking suspension of the scrutiny of its accounts by the commission, and, therefore, he could not submit the financial record.

The CEC repeatedly asked the lawyer why the party was refusing to comply with the ECP’s orders in the absence of any restraining order by the IHC and adjourned the hearing till Wednesday, rejecting the PTI’s plea to adjourn the case till next week.

The PTI lawyer informed the ECP that the IHC would hear the party’s fresh petition on Wednesday and the Supreme Court was also holding daily hearings in a similar case.

The party had filed a similar writ petition in the IHC in November 2015 after the ECP passed a detailed order exercising its jurisdiction over the case the previous month.

While the IHC did not issue a stay order, the PTI used the pendency of its petition in the IHC as an excuse to refuse to present the financial documents sought by the ECP for over a year.

In February this year, a division bench of the IHC remanded the case back to the ECP with the directives to review its jurisdiction and the locus standi of the petitioner.

The ECP completed its review process and passed a short order on May 8, announcing its complete jurisdiction over the case. In its order, the commission had asked the PTI to produce the financial records as a ‘last chance’ by May 30.

The case was filed by PTI’s former vice president Akbar S. Babar in November 2014.

Talking to the media outside the ECP, the petitioner alleged that by filing yet another petition in the high court, Mr Khan had proved that he and the PTI were “absconders” and all his allegations of corruption were correct because there was no other plausible reason for running away from accountability.

Mr Babar, once a close confidant of Mr Khan, said the PTI was now firmly in control of people with vested interests. He claimed that the PTI workers would reject the planned ‘sham party elections’.

Published in Dawn, May 31st, 2017

Opinion

Respite needed

Respite needed

All one can fear is a familiar accounting exercise that aims to extract a few more rupees from a narrow, weary economic base.

Editorial

Soft on traders
08 Jun, 2026

Soft on traders

THE Fixed Tax Asaan Scheme for traders with an annual turnover of up to Rs200m has been designed as a ‘pragmatic...
Ceasefire in name
Updated 08 Jun, 2026

Ceasefire in name

Both sides accuse the other of violating the truce that was supposed to halt the conflict in April, yet neither appears willing to abandon negotiations altogether.
Damaged childhoods
08 Jun, 2026

Damaged childhoods

CHILD abuse is so prevalent that the UN ranked Pakistan as the least safe country for children. Even so, more than...
JAAC ban
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

JAAC ban

Though the JAAC’s demands are open to scrutiny, banning any political organisation — as long as it remains committed to peaceful activism — is undemocratic.
GB election
Updated 07 Jun, 2026

GB election

It is important that whichever party ultimately forms the government puts the needs of the people of GB above everything else.
ODI win
07 Jun, 2026

ODI win

AT last, the Pakistan cricket team had something to celebrate: a One-day International series victory against...