Militancy nexus

Published September 21, 2016

CHIEF Justice Anwar Zaheer Jamali’s comments on Monday about a “nexus” between certain political and religious parties, and terrorists is not only a bold assertion of the truth, it also vindicates what many — including this paper — have been saying for long: until political and religious parties distance themselves from violent elements under their wing, the war against militancy will not be won. Several examples spring to mind that confirm Chief Justice Jamali’s concerns. For example in Karachi, the existence of a militant wing of the MQM has been an open secret for decades. Until the Muttahida got on the wrong side of the security establishment recently, it held Karachi in a vice-like grip, enforced by its dreaded militant faction. The PPP also patronised elements from Karachi’s underworld — specifically in Lyari — in the shape of the so-called Peoples Amn Committee. But beyond the metropolis, mainstream parties have also consorted with militant elements in unambiguous ways. PML-N stalwart Rana Sanaullah had hobnobbed with the leaders of banned sectarian outfits during election time, while suspects linked to Al Qaeda have been recovered from Lahore and other Punjab cities, reportedly provided shelter by Jamaat-i-Islami cadres, and those of Jamiat, the JI’s student wing. Meanwhile, religious parties, especially the JUI-F, have launched vitriolic campaigns against attempts by the state to register and regulate madressahs. While not all seminaries are involved in violence, militants have been known to use madressahs affiliated with hard-line outfits to find sanctuary.

As these observations indicate, very few of Pakistan’s political and religious parties can claim to have a clean record where supporting violent elements is concerned. This should not be used as a brush to tar all political groups; after all, other power centres, such as the establishment, have also patronised hard-line groups. However, the chief justice’s remarks should encourage internal reflection within political parties and religious groups. As he said, breaking the nexus is imperative. The fact is, a legal counterterrorism battle is just as important to defeat militancy, as is action in the field. This requires prosecutors and the judiciary to proceed against those involved in terrorism without fear. Therefore, all political and religious groups must transparently and permanently distance themselves from elements that are involved in violence. Unless this is done, they will be seen as providing cover for terrorists and other criminal elements, and should be prepared to face the law for doing so.

Published in Dawn, September 21st, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...