Supreme Court judge sorry for branding Trump a ‘faker’

Published July 15, 2016
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ─ AFP/File
Ruth Bader Ginsburg ─ AFP/File

WASHINGTON: US Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg apologised on Thursday for publicly disparaging Donald Trump as a phoney with a big ego.

The left-leaning 83-year-old judge shocked the US political establishment with her remarks: on Monday she called Trump “a faker” who “says whatever comes into his head at the moment.” She also told The New York Times in an interview published last weekend that she “can’t imagine” what the United States under Trump as president would be like. Ginsburg issued a statement on Thursday saying she was sorry.

“On reflection, my recent remarks in response to press inquiries were ill-advised and I regret making them,” Ginsburg said.

“Judges should avoid commenting on a candidate for public office. In the future I will be more circumspect,” she added.

In response to the criticism, Trump had suggested the judge was getting senile and should step down.

“Justice Ginsburg of the US Supreme Court has embarrassed all by making very dumb political statements about me. Her mind is shot — resign!” he tweeted on Wednesday.

Ginsburg drew widespread ire from Republicans for breaking with a code of conduct under which US judges are not supposed to publicly endorse or oppose a candidate for office.

The Washington Post and The New York Times both ran editorials saying she had erred.

Ginsburg, seen as a tough as nails figure, was appointed to the court in 1993 by then president Bill Clinton, a Democrat, and is the darling of the progressive community in America, especially young people.

She has lots of clout. Last year, she was named to Time’s list of the 100 Most Influential People in the world.

As a lawyer, Ginsburg was a pillar of the fight for women’s rights in the 1960s and ‘70s. She has survived cancer several times.

But her departure from judicial custom in slamming Trump raised eyebrows everywhere, even among ideological allies.

Published in Dawn, July 15th, 2016

Opinion

Editorial

Back in parliament
Updated 27 Jul, 2024

Back in parliament

It is ECP's responsibility to set right all the wrongs it committed in the Feb 8 general elections.
Brutal crime
27 Jul, 2024

Brutal crime

No effort has been made to even sensitise police to the gravity of crime involving sexual assaults, let alone train them to properly probe such cases.
Upholding rights
27 Jul, 2024

Upholding rights

Sanctity of rights bodies, such as the HRCP, should be inviolable in a civilised environment.
Judicial constraints
Updated 26 Jul, 2024

Judicial constraints

The fact that it is being prescribed by the legislature will be questioned, given the political context.
Macabre spectacle
26 Jul, 2024

Macabre spectacle

Israel knows that regardless of the party that wins the presidency, America’s ‘ironclad’ support for its genocidal endeavours will continue.