Terror in Ankara

Published October 13, 2015

SATURDAY’S deadly blast that killed at least 128 people and injured over 200 in Ankara couldn’t have come at a worse time for Turkey.

Tensions across the nation are high. Last June’s general election stripped Recep Tayyip Erdogan’s Justice and Development Party of its majority in parliament, and no party was willing to share power with him, forcing the president to go for another election.

While the fanatic hordes of the self-styled Islamic State occupy large chunks of territory near the Turkish border, the nation’s decades-old Kurdish issue has resurfaced with greater intensity.

Take a look: At least 86 dead in attack on Ankara peace rally

One major upset in the June election was the stunning political success of the Kurdish People’s Democratic Party (HDP), which crossed the 10pc vote barrier and entered parliament. More unfortunately for the country, the truce with the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) broke down, thus renewing a 30-year-old conflict which has claimed over 40,000 lives.

This has aroused intense nationalist feelings across Turkey, though his opponents accuse Mr Erdogan of deliberately escalating the war on the PKK to cash in on anti-PKK sentiments and deny the HDP another electoral triumph.

To make matter worse, a large number of Kurds from Turkey have joined Syrian Kurds and managed to occupy some territory on the Turkish border. This adds new dimensions to a complex situation, for it is Syrian and Turkish Kurds who have offered the most determined resistance to the IS.

Yet, for Mr Erdogan it is the Kurdish insurgency rather that the IS that is the problem.

Who bombed the Ankara rally is not yet clear. Prime Minister Ahmet Davutoglu suspects four parties, including the IS, but the IS has yet to claim responsibility.

The opposition’s charge that the government caused the blasts shows Mr Erdogan’s growing unpopularity with a wide cross section of the people — hard-line Turkish nationalists, liberal elements unhappy with his authoritarian methods and the followers of the Gulen movement among them.

All this is happening at a time when Moscow’s role in Syria has assumed greater proportions, with Russian planes violating Turkish airspace. The bitter polarisation centring on Mr Erdogan’s personality and the worsening regional situation call for a calmer Turkey.

We can only hope that Mr Erdogan will learn to be more realistic, that the Nov 1 election will give a clearer parliamentary picture and that this will lead to a cohesive coalition government, which is able to give Turkey stability, consolidate the country’s economic gains and wage a determined war on terrorism.

Published in Dawn, October 13th, 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

A long war?

A long war?

Both sides should have a common interest in averting a protracted conflict but the impasse persists.

Editorial

Interlinked crises
Updated 04 May, 2026

Interlinked crises

The situation vis-à-vis the US-Israeli war on Iran remains tense, with hostilities likely to resume if the diplomatic process fails.
Climate readiness
04 May, 2026

Climate readiness

AS policymakers gather for the Breathe Pakistan conference this week, the urgency is hard to miss. Each year, such...
Kalash preservation
04 May, 2026

Kalash preservation

FOR centuries, the Kalash people have maintained a culture, way of life, language and belief system that is uniquely...
On press freedoms
Updated 03 May, 2026

On press freedoms

THE citizenry forgets, to its own peril, how important a free and independent media is in the preservation of their...
Inflation strain
03 May, 2026

Inflation strain

PAKISTAN’S return to double-digit inflation after 21 months signals renewed economic strain where external shocks...
Troubled waters
03 May, 2026

Troubled waters

PAKISTAN’S water crisis is often framed in terms of scarcity. Increasingly, it is also a crisis of contamination....