US considering nuclear deal with Pakistan: report

Published October 8, 2015
The US “urges all nuclear-capable states, including Pakistan, to exercise restraint” regarding nuclear capabilities.—Reuters/File
The US “urges all nuclear-capable states, including Pakistan, to exercise restraint” regarding nuclear capabilities.—Reuters/File
“The issue is being discussed quietly in the run-up to Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington on Oct 22.—AP/File
“The issue is being discussed quietly in the run-up to Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington on Oct 22.—AP/File

WASHINGTON: The United States is exploring an option that could pave the way for a civil nuclear deal with Pakistan like the one concluded with India in 2005, says a report published in The Washington Post on Wednesday.

“The issue is being discussed quietly in the run-up to Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s visit to Washington on Oct 22,” said leading columnist David Ignatius in an article he wrote for the Post.

“We are in regular contact with the government of Pakistan on a range of issues as we prepare for the prime minister’s visit,” a US government spokesperson told Dawn when asked for comments on the report. “We’ll decline comment on the specifics of these discussions,” she added.

Also read: US NSA appreciates Pakistan Army’s role in war on terror

The spokesperson also said that the United States “urges all nuclear-capable states, including Pakistan, to exercise restraint” regarding nuclear weapons and missile capabilities.

“We encourage efforts to strengthen safety and security measures and continue to hold regular discussions with Pakistan on a range of global issues, including nuclear security, counter-terrorism, and international norms,” she said.

Pakistan’s Ambassador in Washington, Jalil Abbas Jilani, emphasised the “defensive” nature of his country’s nuclear programme when asked for comments on the Post report.

“Pakistan’s nuclear programme is determined by our legitimate security concerns and Pakistan would never compromise on its national security,” he told Dawn.

“Pakistan’s nuclear programme is for defensive purposes only.”

The Post report claimed that the proposed deal could place new limits and controls on Pakistan’s nuclear arsenal in return for “a version of the civil nuclear deal”.

The move is part of fresh efforts by the White House to reduce tensions and violence in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

Mr Ignatius said the proposed nuclear accord with Pakistan was a “diplomatic blockbuster” that would place “possible new limits and controls on Pakistan’s nuclear weapons and delivery systems.”

It “might eventually open a path towards a Pakistani version of the civil nuclear deal that was launched with India in 2005”, he wrote.

A source familiar with the talks told Mr Ignatius that Pakistan “had been asked to consider what are described as ‘brackets’. Pakistan would agree to restrict its nuclear programme to weapons and delivery systems that are appropriate to its actual defence needs against India’s nuclear threat”, the article said.

“Pakistan might agree not to deploy missiles capable of reaching beyond a certain range, for example,” it said.

In return, the US “might support an eventual waiver for Pakistan by the 48-nation Nuclear Suppliers Group”.

It was the United States that persuaded the NSG to exempt India from the rules that banned nuclear trade with countries that had not signed the Non-Proliferation Treaty.

The civil nuclear deal allowed India to join an exclusive club of nuclear powers in exchange for applying International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards to its civilian programme.

Mr Ignatius wrote: “Pakistan prizes its nuclear programme, so negotiations would be slow and difficult, and it’s not clear that Islamabad would be willing to accept the limitations that would be required.”

Any progress would break a stalemate that has existed since the US detected Pakistan’s nuclear programme in the mid-1980s, and especially after Pakistan exploded its first weapon in 1998.

Pakistan has repeatedly sought a civil nuclear deal on the lines of the one given to India, describing the current US policy as discriminatory.

The United States argued that it could not make a similar deal with Pakistan because the former head of its atomic programme, Dr. A. Q, Khan sold nuclear technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea.

Mr Ignatius also wrote that the pace of negotiations aimed at tackling the violence in Afghanistan has quickened “thanks to an unlikely US diplomatic partnership with China”.

“A senior administration official said on Monday that ‘we’re hopeful that there will be a willingness on the part of the Taliban to resume negotiations,’ despite the intense fighting in Kunduz and elsewhere. Beijing’s involvement is a ‘new dynamic’ and shows an instance where ‘US interests overlap with those of China’,” Mr Ignatius wrote.

The article claimed that since 2011, US State Department officials had been conducting secret peace talks with the Taliban. This is because they recognised that the best way out of the Afghanistan conflict would be a diplomatic settlement with “the Taliban and its sometime sponsors in Pakistan,” the article said.

Published in Dawn, October 8th , 2015

On a mobile phone? Get the Dawn Mobile App: Apple Store | Google Play

Opinion

Climate & youth

Climate & youth

Disillusionment and anxiety are on the rise among youth as they confront the diminishing prospects of a better tomorrow.
Our exclusivity syndrome
Updated 17 Oct 2021

Our exclusivity syndrome

Pakistan needs at least a minimum level of inclusivity that can keep alive democratic values.
Shafqat Kakakhel
Updated 16 Oct 2021

Shafqat Kakakhel

COP26 has to achieve consensus on several issues.

Editorial

Carnage in Kandahar
Updated 17 Oct 2021

Carnage in Kandahar

Pakistan’s anti-extremism policy is in many ways half-baked and inconsistent.
17 Oct 2021

Sanctity of contracts

PAKISTAN is facing yet another international dispute before the International Centre for Settlement of Investment...
17 Oct 2021

New sports policy

THIS week, the Pakistan Football Federation Normalisation Committee chief Haroon Malik was in Zurich to hold ...
Diminishing freedom
Updated 16 Oct 2021

Diminishing freedom

DESPITE the serious reservations of digital rights activists and tech companies, the federal government has...
16 Oct 2021

Dirty politics

IN her outburst against Prime Minister Imran Khan this week, PML-N leader Maryam Nawaz may not have taken names but...
16 Oct 2021

Decreasing emissions

THE announcement by SAPM on Climate Change Malik Amin Aslam that carbon emissions in the country came down by 9pc...