Killing outside churches, lynching in the streets

Published March 16, 2015
Angry Christians lynch a person who they suspect is involved in a suicide bombing attack on churches in Lahore, on March 15, 2015. —AP
Angry Christians lynch a person who they suspect is involved in a suicide bombing attack on churches in Lahore, on March 15, 2015. —AP

At first, Sunday’s terrorist act seemed like just the latest in a long line of horrific attacks on religious minorities in Pakistan.

Taliban militants assaulted two Christian churches in Lahore. At least 15 people were killed, and more than 70 were wounded.

But then, all of a sudden, the targeted became the targeters.

Scores of enraged Christians marched through Lahore. They lynched and murdered two men. As they lay dying, some members of the mob gleefully took out their mobiles and captured photographs for posterity. It was sickening and macabre.

This is not how victims usually respond to terror attacks in Pakistan.

Typically they grieve quietly, even if defiantly. Recall those Hazara Shias in Quetta standing in the cold rain, flanked by the bodies of the dead and refusing to bury their loved ones until receiving assurances of protection from the state.

This is in marked contrast to the violent retaliations in Lahore.

Ominously, this reaction could mark the start of a dangerous yet sadly logical new phase in Pakistan’s sectarian conflict — one that deepens the fault lines of an already fractured country, and that could one day, bring it to the cusp of all-out civil war.

In Pictures: Tears, anger and agony as Lahore bleeds

I’ve argued previously that sectarianism poses the greatest threat to Pakistan’s long-term stability. Sectarian militancy — even after the much-ballyhooed North Waziristan counterterrorism offensive — enjoys broad reach.

Lashkar-e-Jhangvi, after all, has staged attacks in all four Pakistani provinces. Meanwhile, many Pakistanis embrace the underlying views of sectarian extremists; witness the polls that find that majorities of Pakistanis do not regard Shias as Muslims. This isn’t surprising, given how the Pakistani state has essentially institutionalised sect-based discrimination — from the second constitutional amendment to the blasphemy laws. Then there are the troubling links between sectarian militants and the state.

In essence, sectarian militants benefit from nationwide reach, ample public support for their views, and some support from the state.

Hence the dire predicament faced by Pakistan’s imperiled religious minorities — and the extreme measures to which some of them resorted to in the aftermath of the Sunday church bombings in Lahore.

The Christians that killed those two men did not commit premeditated murder. They were retaliating, and for a simple reason: Like so many other religious minorities in Pakistan, they have been terrified, traumatised, and terrorised for too long, and they know the state will not protect them.

So on Sunday, they decided to take matters in to their own hands.

Out of desperation, they became vigilantes.

This is the context that helps explain why they responded in the way that they did (disturbingly, many on Twitter have drawn equivalence between these retaliatory acts and the terrorist acts that provoked them).

Galvanized by what happened on Sunday, other members of religious minorities could follow suit and lash out violently when their own neighborhoods or places of worship are attacked.

As these violent retaliatory actions mount, the bad apples of society could strike back at vulnerable minorities with tit-for-tat violence — in effect ushering in the very sectarian mayhem that local militants aim to manufacture.

This would be deeply tragic, and not just because of the consequent bloodshed and loss of life.

Despite being ravaged by radicalisation, Pakistani society’s capacity to do great things remains unlimited; many outside observers, including myself, have long admired it for this very reason.

And yet, thanks to an absentee state and a militant juggernaut, it could soon find itself being torn asunder.

Opinion

Missing I.A. Rehman’s wisdom
18 Apr 2021

Missing I.A. Rehman’s wisdom

Does the state of Pakistan, all institutions included, have the political will to address the runaway intolerance in society and
Ostrich approach
18 Apr 2021

Ostrich approach

The logic of blocking social media to contain protests is flawed.
Wings of mediation
18 Apr 2021

Wings of mediation

ADR benefits could ensure the expeditious settlement of tax disputes.
Banning Mr Rizvi
17 Apr 2021

Banning Mr Rizvi

Sooner than later, fanatics start to pull their own strings.

Editorial

18 Apr 2021

More cabinet changes

PRIME MINISTER Imran Khan has reshuffled his cabinet yet again in what is obviously another attempt to shore up his...
Blocking social media
Updated 18 Apr 2021

Blocking social media

FOR four hours this week, all social media platforms in the country were shut down, a measure the government said ...
18 Apr 2021

Peasant rights in Sindh

IN a seminar held in Nawabshah recently, the Sindh Human Rights Commission and Hari Welfare Association reiterated a...
17 Apr 2021

Pak-India mediation

QUESTIONS had been swirling about what and who has prompted the latest detente between Pakistan and India. Now, it...
17 Apr 2021

Energy exploration

SOME exploration and production companies want the government to prioritise offshore exploration — a high-risk...
17 Apr 2021

Professor’s removal

IN a step that will go far in sending a message of reassurance to female students and academic staff in ...