Anatomy of an apologist: A double-act play

Published December 20, 2014
But we planted the bomb, fool. No, you didn't! —Credit: Freepik
But we planted the bomb, fool. No, you didn't! —Credit: Freepik

Terrorist: We have just bombed a market to avenge the military's operation against us.

Outraged Man: You are an animal!

Apologist: Gentlemen, gentlemen, please, this is serious.

Outraged Man: You animal, you slaughtered innocent people!

Apologist: No, he didn't.

Terrorist: Yes, we did.

Outraged Man: You heard him. He said he did.

Apologist: Well, yes and no.

Outraged Man: What do you mean?

Terrorist: Yes, what do you mean?

Apologist: Well, yes the bombing they did was a condemnable act, but they didn't do it.

Outraged Man: But he just said he did, and even you said 'the bombing they did ...'

Apologist: Okay, let me rephrase it. The bombing was a condemnable act done by the enemies of our faith and the country.

Terrorist: You calling me an enemy of faith?

Apologist: No, I'm calling those who planted the bomb, the enemy.

Terrorist: But we planted the bomb, fool.

Apologist: No, you didn't.

Outraged Man: But he just said that he did.

Apologist: Well, yes and no.

Outraged Man: Are you deaf?

Terrorist: Don't call him deaf, infidel.

Outraged Man: Oh, so now you agree with him?

Terrorist: I agree that he is not deaf.

Outraged Man: But he says you didn't bomb that market.

Terrorist: Yes, we did. And we shall carry out more such attacks!

Apologist: Our brother is angry ...

Outraged Man: He's not my brother! How can you call him your brother?

Apologist: Because he is. We have misunderstood him. We need to guide him back from the wrong course he has taken ...

Terrorist: The heck you do. You are the ones on the wrong course. We will destroy that course by bombing it out of existence, like we bombed that market.

Apologist: No, you didn't.

Outraged Man: But he just said he did. You are deaf!

Terrorist: Don't call him deaf. And yes, I said we bombed that market.

Apologist: Gentlemen, gentlemen, both of you are being used by our enemies.

Terrorist: You are our enemy!

Apologist (discreetly pointing at the Outraged Man and whispering): No, no, he ... he is your enemy.

Outraged Man: I heard that! You hypocrite!

Terrorist: Don't call him a hypocrite, you hypocrite. Only I can call him a hypocrite.

Outraged Man: You are the biggest hypocrite there is. A reptile ...

Apologist: Gentlemen, gentlemen, can the both of you just sit together like two good patriots and talk things out? Let's give peace a chance, shall we?

Outraged Man: How can one talk peace with people who are hell-bent on destroying everything in their path?

Terrorist: Yes, we do destroy, for the greater good of the faith and the ...

Outraged Man: Oh, please, spare us your ill-informed and vile nonsense, you reptile!

Terrorist: You infidel and stooges of the West ...!

Apologist: He has a point.

Outraged Man: What?

Apologist: We are fighting them on the behest of the West, aren't we?

Outraged Man: So you are saying it is okay for them to slaughter our civilians, cops, politicians and soldiers?

Apologist: No, no, this is not what I am saying. I am saying that terrorism in our country is due to us trying to fight a war that is not our own.

Outraged Man: So thus it is okay to indulge in shameless bloodbaths?

Apologist: Our brothers are not responsible for this ...

Terrorist: Yes, we are!

Apologist: No, you aren't!

Outraged Man: He just said he is, you ostrich.

Terrorist: Don't call him an ostrich, you dog!

Outraged Man: Dogs at least have emotions, unlike snakes ...

Terrorist: You infidels, I'll blow you all!

Apologist (discretely pointing towards the Outraged Man and whispering): Him, him ... he's the dog ...

Outraged Man: I saw that! You both are one and the same.

Apologist: We don't want war. We want peace. Right, misguided brother?

Terrorist: I want pieces. Pieces of those who are stopping our path towards attaining a pious state and ...

Outraged Man: Oh, so you want to build your pious state with the innocent pieces of men, women and children?

Terrorist: They are not innocent. None of you are!

Apologist: Gentlemen, gentlemen ...

Outraged Man: Oh, shut up!

Terrorist: Don't tell him to shut up ...

Outraged Man: I wasn't. I was telling you to shut up.

Apologist: Don't tell him to shut up ...

Terrorist: Shut up! I'm wearing a suicide vest, infidel!

Apologist: No, no, you're not.

Terrorist: Yes, I am. Here, see.

Apologist: No, you're not.

Outraged Man: But he just said he was. Can't you see it? Are you blind?

Terrorist: Don't call him blind.

Apologist: He was forced to wear one.

Outraged Man: Oh, so you agree that he is wearing one ...

Apologist: No, I said he was forced to.

Terrorist: No, I wasn't. Nobody forced me to.

Apologist: Yes, you were ...

Outraged Man: Oh, for heaven’s sake ...

Terrorist: Yes, that's it.

Outraged Man: What?

Apologist: Gentlemen, gentlemen ...

Outrage Man: Oh, shut up ...

Terrorist: I said do not tell him to shut up (Boom! He explodes himself).

Outraged Man: cough cough See ... I ... I ... told you, he was ... was ... was wearing one ...

Apologist: cough cough Well ... I guess, he was ... But ... cough ... I don't think he was one of us ... I think he was foreign ...

Outraged Man: But you called him a brother. Are you mad?

Terrorist: cough ... cough ... don't ... don't .... don't call him mad ... (Passes away).


Act 2 (A week later):

Apologist: He was a martyr.

Outraged Man: Oh, so now you are calling him a martyr. What about those he slaughtered?

Apologist: They are martyrs as well. At least some of them.

Outraged Man: How can that be?

Apologist: Well, you see ...

(An army man comes in): We have decided to launch a full scale operation against the terrorists. (He leaves).

Apologist: Hmmm. Anyway, so as I was saying, you see, these terrorists are animals, reptiles, brutes, and we should support the army in crushing them!

Outraged Man: Oh, now they are animals?

Apologist: Yes ... foreign funded ... like you.

Opinion

Editorial

Out of control
Updated 19 Feb, 2025

Out of control

AS bodies continue to fall in Kurram despite a state-sanctioned ceasefire, one wonders how long local militants’...
Hollow words
19 Feb, 2025

Hollow words

IT is not uncommon for politicians to resort to the use of hyperbole in order to boost their public standing. ...
Migration matters
19 Feb, 2025

Migration matters

THE grass, it seems, did appear greener on the other side to millions of people as evidenced by the latest UN ...
Cholistan project
Updated 18 Feb, 2025

Cholistan project

GPI goals align with Pakistan's broader economic aims but the manner in which the initiative was launched raises questions.
Right to know
18 Feb, 2025

Right to know

IT is an unfortunate paradox that while on paper Pakistan has some of the most impressive right to information laws,...
Dam dispute
18 Feb, 2025

Dam dispute

THE situation in Chilas needs attention and a fair-minded approach so that it can be resolved amicably. Diamer ...