UK nears decision on ex-Barclays bankers

Published August 16, 2014
As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays avoided a state bailout by securing almost 12 billion pounds from two emergency cash injections. — Photo by AFP
As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays avoided a state bailout by securing almost 12 billion pounds from two emergency cash injections. — Photo by AFP

LONDON: Britain’s fraud prosecutor could decide as soon as next month whether to charge former Barclays executives over undisclosed payments the bank made to Qatari investors in 2008, three sources familiar with the investigation said.

In a two-year investigation the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has interviewed former chief executives Bob Diamond and John Varley, former finance director Chris Lucas, former tax advisory boss Roger Jenkins and other Barclays staff.

Barclays and a spokesman for Diamond declined to comment. Varley, Lucas and Jenkins could not be reached or did not respond to requests for comment.

The SFO has not specified why it is investigating the payments Barclays made to Qatar Holdings when the Qatari sovereign wealth fund invested in the bank. SFO head David Green would only say: “We are making progress with this case, and we are not going away.”

The sources said the agency was expected to decide by late-September or October whether to charge any of the men, after examining its evidence to determine whether there is a realistic prospect of conviction and that a prosecution is in the public interest.

If charged, these would be the most senior bankers prosecuted to date for alleged crimes during the 2007-08 financial crisis, which brought the global financial system to its knees and plunged much of the world into recession.

As the credit crisis raged in 2008, Barclays, unlike rivals Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds, avoided a state bailout — and the restrictions that would have come with it — by securing almost 12 billion pounds ($20bn) from two emergency cash injections, mostly from Middle East investors.

But the deal came at a cost.

As part of the deal, Barclays revealed 116 million pounds in advisory fees and commission to Qatar Holdings, but Britain’s Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) said it had failed to reveal another 322m pounds in two “advisory services agreements” with the Qatari company.

The FCA said the non-disclosure was “reckless” and could have broken the bank’s duty to act with integrity to all its shareholders. It fined the bank 50m pounds.

Barclays said it had disclosed one of the agreements, but not the value, and is contesting the FCA findings.

Published in Dawn, August 16th , 2014

Follow Dawn Business on Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Border clashes
19 May, 2024

Border clashes

THE Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier has witnessed another series of flare-ups, this time in the Kurram tribal district...
Penalising the dutiful
19 May, 2024

Penalising the dutiful

DOES the government feel no remorse in burdening honest citizens with the cost of its own ineptitude? With the ...
Students in Kyrgyzstan
19 May, 2024

Students in Kyrgyzstan

BEING stranded on foreign shores is hardly an agreeable experience. And if the environment is hostile — as it...
Ominous demands
Updated 18 May, 2024

Ominous demands

The federal government needs to boost its revenues to reduce future borrowing and pay back its existing debt.
Property leaks
18 May, 2024

Property leaks

THE leaked Dubai property data reported on by media organisations around the world earlier this week seems to have...
Heat warnings
18 May, 2024

Heat warnings

STARTING next week, the country must brace for brutal heatwaves. The NDMA warns of severe conditions with...