Alert Sign Dear reader, online ads enable us to deliver the journalism you value. Please support us by taking a moment to turn off Adblock on

Alert Sign Dear reader, please upgrade to the latest version of IE to have a better reading experience



Your Name:

Recipient Email:

THE war talk emanating from various Western capitals regarding Syria may result in a dangerous escalation of an already bloody conflict. The US is mulling military action against Damascus in reaction to an alleged chemical attack last week, while the UK and France have said the UN could be bypassed in order to allow armed intervention. Washington also says Syria’s decision to allow UN inspectors to probe the reported attack has come “too late”. While international opponents of Bashar al-Assad’s regime blame the strongman for the alleged atrocity, Damascus says the Syrian rebels are responsible. Many in the international community are not keen to launch another pointless war: Russia and Iran have forcefully condemned the war talk while China has called for a “cautious” approach.

What is clear is that any war, whether it involves Western\Nato boots on the ground — not likely in Syria’s case — or aerial bombardment, will only worsen the situation. While there are reports that US intelligence agencies have “very little doubt” the Assad regime orchestrated the chemical attack, this must be taken with a grain of salt. The devastation of Iraq is testimony to the folly of launching wars on the basis of questionable intelligence. Besides, if Mr Assad falls because of Western intervention, who will fill the power vacuum? The list of candidates — from hardened Islamist militants to the more secular yet hapless rebels — is not very appealing and the US military’s top brass has admitted as much. As for the chemical attack itself, it must be condemned no matter who perpetrated it. The UN team of inspectors investigating the incident must be allowed to do its job while global players must realise that going to war after bypassing the world body will have disastrous results. The fog of war often obfuscates the truth; that is the reason why irresponsible talk of aggression on the basis of unverified intelligence should not be used to push Syria further into chaos.

Comments (2) Closed Aug 27, 2013 07:54am

Dear Editor, Talk is cheap. When you have no solution/suggestion why do you even bother to write something? War is very bad. But do you have anything else to say other than say do nothing when more than 100,000 people have been killed and millions more have been made homeless and refugees, over more than two years? If not, please shut up and some one else at least try do something!

SRK Aug 28, 2013 04:41am

Good comment - what was achieved by the fabricated tale of 'Weapons of mass destruction' by Bush and co., except that they managed to create destability in the region, and the fall of monetary system across the world.