IT is again that time of the year when we find ourselves speculating on whether or not Pakistani and Indian leaders will agree to a one-on-one on the sidelines of the forthcoming UN General Assembly session. This year tension on the boundaries has added greater uncertainty to this sadly routine debate — it is a reminder of the work pending to bring closer these two distant neighbours. Islamabad and New Delhi have accused each other of violating the 2003 ceasefire. On Tuesday, India said the death of five of its soldiers on the LoC will delay the much anticipated talks between top bureaucrats from the two countries. It invoked the “sanctity” of the LoC as the “most important confidence-building measure”. On its part, Pakistan’s military maintains the crisis has been created by India and it will persist so long as India wants it to.

This is an all too familiar if unyielding jumble of statements. The reality may never be allowed to emerge in the name of patriotism and national interests, with some in the media preferring jingoism to investigating the facts or the promotion of peace. Some Indian commentators have been quick to repeat their condemnation of what they call Pakistan’s aggressive intent, depending by and large on Indian military feeds. On this side of the border, a number of theories are doing the rounds seeking to explain the Indian need to challenge Pakistan militarily at this moment, again without the facts.

Fortunately, the voices which are able to see war and war-mongering as more than a game to indulge in are stronger today than ever before. These voices mark the real progress that people in both Pakistan and India have made on the path to a peaceful resolution of the problems. They bring out the futility of war, of war-mongering, and have the capacity to be heard loud and clear over the thoughtless cries for violent ‘solutions’. If jingoism is practised by some, it is worthwhile to count the number of times it has been described as such — jingoism. This is a strain that has to be augmented by the leadership. Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif’s statement committing his government to good relations with India has to be followed up by a sustained effort towards the quick de-escalation of tensions and paving the way for a return to the dialogue table. A meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly session next month could go a long way in achieving this objective.

Opinion

Editorial

Iran’s counterstrike
Updated 15 Apr, 2024

Iran’s counterstrike

Israel, by attacking Iran’s diplomatic facilities and violating Syrian airspace, is largely responsible for this dangerous situation.
Opposition alliance
15 Apr, 2024

Opposition alliance

AFTER the customary Ramazan interlude, political activity has resumed as usual. A ‘grand’ opposition alliance ...
On the margins
15 Apr, 2024

On the margins

IT appears that we are bent upon taking the majoritarian path. Thus, the promise of respect and equality for the...
Noshki killings
Updated 14 Apr, 2024

Noshki killings

It must be asked why Baloch separatists continue to target civilians as well as security men despite large deployment.
Upholding the law
14 Apr, 2024

Upholding the law

THE recent discord in Bahawalnagar offers a chance to reflect on the sanctity of the law and its enforcement across...
Tragic travels
14 Apr, 2024

Tragic travels

FOR those embarking on road and boat journeys, the probability of fatal accidents has seen a steady rise. The recent...