Nuclear power reversal?

Published January 13, 2013

ALMOST two years after the triple meltdown at Fukushima Daiichi power plant sent shockwaves around the world, Japan’s government is attempting to resell the nuclear dream to a traumatised public.

Japan appeared to have ended its addiction to nuclear power when the previous centre-left government pledged last year to phase out all of the country’s 50 working reactors by 2040.

The announcement marked a dramatic shift from pre-Fukushima plans to increase Japan’s dependence on nuclear from 30 per cent to 50 per cent by 2030. For the emboldened anti-nuclear lobby, it heralded the start of an unprecedented shift towards renewable energy.

But the return to office last month of the conservative Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) under Shinzo Abe effectively killed off the idea of a non-nuclear Japan. It was no coincidence that within days of the LDP victory, Tepco, the firm that operates Fukushima Daiichi, saw a dramatic rise in its share price — but nowhere near the level it was before the accident.

The new government has announced a review of the nuclear phase-out, adding that reactors would be restarted if they passed safety tests, and it refused to rule out the construction of new ones.

Critics of the phase-out have pointed to the economic and environmental costs of Japan’s dependence on expensive oil and gas imports since it took all but two of its nuclear reactors offline in the wake of the Fukushima accident.

Japan’s trade minister, Toshimitsu Motegi, warned that the government would not allow its plans to revive the economy to be derailed by a commitment to going non-nuclear. “We need to reconsider the previous administration’s policy that aimed to make zero nuclear power possible by the 2030s,” he said.

It could take months — perhaps years — before a significant number of reactors are switched back on. And while anti-nuclear candidates performed abysmally in last month’s general election, the public remains sceptical about industry promises to mend its ways after decades of collusion with regulators and pro-nuclear politicians.

But those concerns are unlikely to hold much sway with the LDP, which helped develop Japan’s “nuclear village” — the web of power utilities, bureaucrats and MPs who peddled the nuclear dream and shunned rigorous regulation.

As Abe said soon after becoming prime minister: “A strong economy is the source of energy for Japan. Without regaining a strong economy, there is no future for Japan.” If he gets his way, that future will include a role for nuclear. — The Guardian, London

Opinion

Editorial

Water win
19 May, 2026

Water win

Besides being a technical and legal win, the ruling validates Pakistan’s argument about the existential stakes involved for it.
Free ride
19 May, 2026

Free ride

THE federal and provincial governments have extended what appear to be major concessions to the retail sector ahead...
Ceasefire in name
19 May, 2026

Ceasefire in name

THE ink on the latest ceasefire extension between Israel and Lebanon was barely dry when Israeli warplanes were back...
The Afghan problem
Updated 18 May, 2026

The Afghan problem

It is to its own peril that the Afghan side seems to be mistaking Islamabad’s restraint for lack of resolve.
Unwillingness to tax
18 May, 2026

Unwillingness to tax

THE latest IMF staff report reveals the scale of Pakistan’s fiscal dilemma. The approval of fresh disbursements...
Unkind cyberspace
18 May, 2026

Unkind cyberspace

WHEN abuse occurs face to face, the boundaries are clear. Yet, the same behaviour online is treated less seriously....