US security strategy

Published May 29, 2010

Mr Obama announced that the US would “seek broad international support” if a pre-emptive strike becomes necessary. References were also made to recognising the reality of a multipolar world and the need to look beyond current conflicts to their long-term consequences. For the first time ever, the annual security strategy also admits that the Arab-Israeli conflict is a “source of tension.” - AP Photo

Changing the way America went about its business domestically and globally was the dominant message of Barack Obama's presidential campaign. It struck a chord with a war-weary nation and young voters in particular turned out in large numbers to send Mr Obama to the White House. Since then, however, the difference between the leeway enjoyed by a candidate and the constraints under which the president must work has become all too stark.

 

Change has been slow in coming and some pledges, such as the commitment to shut down the Guantanamo Bay detention centre, remain unfulfilled to this day. But there have been successes too. Internationally Mr Obama has made an effort to reach out to the Muslim world to repair a relationship that suffered untold damage under George Bush. In much of the world, in fact, America's image has improved since Mr Obama came to office.

His international stock should rise further if the security strategy unveiled in Washington on Thursday becomes the cornerstone of US foreign policy, not just on paper but in practice. Opting for a more holistic approach to protecting US interests, Mr Obama parted ways with the 'Bush doctrine' under which fighting terrorism overshadowed all other objectives. Counter-terrorism, according to the Obama plan, “cannot define America's engagement with the world.” Though pre-emptive strikes have not been ruled out, these will be considered only after exhausting all other options.

 

In another marked departure from the Bush-era policy of unilateral action, Mr Obama announced that the US would “seek broad international support” if a pre-emptive strike becomes necessary. References were also made to recognising the reality of a multipolar world and the need to look beyond current conflicts to their long-term consequences. For the first time ever, the annual security strategy also admits that the Arab-Israeli conflict is a “source of tension.”

These are welcome moves, even if they do not deliver on all the promises Mr Obama made during his election campaign. And even though the security plan unveiled on Thursday is not binding, it represents a significant step in the right direction. At the same time, however, it is hoped that Mr Obama's desire to reduce his country's dependency on military might does not result in a hasty withdrawal from Afghanistan. That job must be taken to its logical conclusion.

Opinion

Editorial

Unsustainable growth
Updated 23 Jun, 2026

Unsustainable growth

CLICHÉS are an essential part of political rhetoric. But when repeated often, they lose their impact. So when...
Banned speeches
23 Jun, 2026

Banned speeches

NATIONAL Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq on Sunday formally lifted long-standing restrictions on the airing of ...
New GB government
23 Jun, 2026

New GB government

WITH the newly elected lawmakers of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly taking oath on Monday, the PPP looks set to head...
A costly cut
Updated 22 Jun, 2026

A costly cut

Climate risks are increasing and public investment should reflect that reality.
Guarded access
22 Jun, 2026

Guarded access

ONE of the government’s ‘novel’ proposals to snag tax evaders has collided with some harsh realities. On...
Lyari’s passion
22 Jun, 2026

Lyari’s passion

THE love for football in Lyari knows no bounds. The World Cup might be underway thousands of miles away in North...