A view of the Gwadar port. — Photo by AFP
A view of the Gwadar port. — Photo by AFP

QUETTA: The Balochistan government has said that ports and shipping are the subjects handled by the federal government and the provincial government has no role in the award of Gwadar Port contract to China.

In a statement issued here late on Friday night, a spokesperson for the Balochistan government termed the criticism of the provincial government for the award of the contract to China unjustified.

He rejected objections raised by some quarters over the role of provincial government on the issue, saying constitutionally the federal government was responsible for taking any decision about ports and shipping.

The spokesperson said Gwadar Port was completed in 2007 at a cost of $287.8 million by a Chinese company and the contract for handling of the port was awarded to a Singaporean company by the then government of Gen Pervez Musharraf.

He said one of the objectives for constructing the port was to create jobs. Under the agreement, the Chinese company would set up a free economic zone in Gwadar which would promote trade and industrial activities, besides connecting Gwadar to other parts of the country.

He said Gwadar Port is an asset of the people of Balochistan, which would strengthen provincial economy.

The spokesperson referred to a statement of Governor Nawab Zulfiqar Magsi in which he said on the eve of the signing of the contract that benefits of Gwadar Port should first be given to the people of Balochistan.

He said experts had expressed apprehensions that if Gwadar Port was not made fully operational its machinery would become unusable. After the construction of three births only 4 million tons of fertiliser and about one million ton of wheat had been imported through the port which was not enough to make it fully operational, he added.

Referring to Reko Diq project, the spokesperson said the previous provincial government took it back from Tethyan Copper Company to run it by itself. The TCC filed a case in the ICC ICA and ICSID, London, against the decision. However, both forums allowed the Balochistan government to continue running the project.

Opinion

Editorial

Under siege
Updated 03 May, 2024

Under siege

Whether through direct censorship, withholding advertising, harassment or violence, the press in Pakistan navigates a hazardous terrain.
Meddlesome ways
03 May, 2024

Meddlesome ways

AFTER this week’s proceedings in the so-called ‘meddling case’, it appears that the majority of judges...
Mass transit mess
03 May, 2024

Mass transit mess

THAT Karachi — one of the world’s largest megacities — does not have a mass transit system worth the name is ...
Punishing evaders
02 May, 2024

Punishing evaders

THE FBR’s decision to block mobile phone connections of more than half a million individuals who did not file...
Engaging Riyadh
Updated 02 May, 2024

Engaging Riyadh

It must be stressed that to pull in maximum foreign investment, a climate of domestic political stability is crucial.
Freedom to question
02 May, 2024

Freedom to question

WITH frequently suspended freedoms, increasing violence and few to speak out for the oppressed, it is unlikely that...