ISLAMABAD, Sept 25: Annoyed by television channels’ free discussions on sub judice matters, the Supreme Court on Tuesday stressed that the electronic media need to devise some code of ethics to deal with sensitive matters.

“The media should devise some code of ethics since the analysts different channels invite in their programmes have neither seen the Constitution nor conversant with it but they made commentary of all sorts,” Justice Javed Iqbal observed.

These analysts, the judge observed, always choose a wrong timing and usually comment on matters which were sub judice before the court.

The observations came when Attorney General Malik Muhammad Qayyum launched a tirade against the media, saying we the government side was victim to a media trial and what ever happened to Ahmed Raza Qasuri on Monday when a lawyer sprayed black paint on his face was the result of all this.

The AG said the media was trying copy the American style of debates on presidential elections but overlooked the fact that in the American media debates were held between presidential candidates.

Referring to a recent programme on a private channel on the presidential elections, the AG deplored that here Advocate Munir A. Malik and others were representing their side while Parliamentary Affairs Minister Dr Sher Afgan was pleading the point of view of the government, whereas the hosts or anchors of the programmes were acting as judges. “This is all Tamasha (fun),” the AG observed, adding that they should not comment on matters which were sub judice before the court.

Justice Mohammad Nawaz Abbasi was also critical that no programmes were aired on the scarcity of wheat flour but they utilised their energy on the presidential elections.

As if the entire problem in this country revolves around President Pervez Musharraf, the AG said sarcastically adding people were rotting in jails and there were lot of problems but these were not highlighted.

“When I say something they doubt on my intentions as if to put curbs on the media,” he recalled.

At this Justice Rana Bhagwandas observed that they enjoyed freedom under Article 19 of the Constitution but the AG replied that those who get freedom should also realise about their responsibility.

Opinion

Editorial

Momentary relief
Updated 10 May, 2026

Momentary relief

THE IMF’s approval of the latest review of Pakistan’s ongoing Fund programme comes at a moment of growing global...
India’s global shame
10 May, 2026

India’s global shame

INDIA’s rabid streak is at an all-time high. Prejudice is now an organised movement to erase religious freedoms ...
Aurat March restrictions
Updated 10 May, 2026

Aurat March restrictions

The message could not have been clearer: women may gather, but only if they remain politically harmless.
Removing subsidies
Updated 09 May, 2026

Removing subsidies

The government no longer has the budgetary space to continue carrying hundreds of billions of rupees in untargeted subsidies while the power sector itself remains trapped in circular debt, inefficiencies, theft and under-recovery.
Scarred at home
09 May, 2026

Scarred at home

WHEN homes turn violent towards children, the psychosocial damage is lifelong. In Pakistan, parental violence is...
Zionist zealotry
09 May, 2026

Zionist zealotry

BOTH the Israeli military and far-right citizens of the Zionist state have been involved in appalling hate crimes...