Flawed NEV incentive

Published
0

THE draft New Energy Vehicle policy gets its destination right. Electrifying transport, cutting the oil import bill and building an export-oriented auto industry are worthwhile goals.

But the incentive structure chosen to achieve them rewards the wrong technology. The main flaw is treating plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles as interchangeable.

Both qualify for the same 1pc sales tax on CKD units and NEV inputs — as if a PHEV running mostly on petrol delivers the same environmental pay-off as a BEV. It does not. Pretending otherwise weakens the policy’s stated purpose.

Weak charging infrastructure and real range anxiety discourage Pakistani consumers from buying BEVs. Subsidising PHEVs just as heavily hands them an easier option, which will show up as progress on paper while doing little to build the charging network or battery-vehicle demand the transition actually needs.

PHEV assemblers received generous concessions under the last auto policy but never delivered localisation or built charging infrastructure. Repeating that arrangement will invite the same outcome: subsidised assembly with no real technology transfer.

Taxing conventional hybrids at 25pc, up from 8.5pc, while cutting PHEV tax to 1pc, amounts to picking a winner through the tax code rather than market competition. That stalls transition towards genuine transport electrification while penalising Japanese manufacturers who built much of Pakistan’s auto parts ecosystem.

A more coherent policy would reserve the sharpest incentives for BEVs, and let others compete on their actual emissions and fuel-savings performance. Consumers, not tax brackets, should decide which of these technologies wins as charging infrastructure improves and prices come down.

The rest of the draft holds up. Export targets, tighter localisation rules and incentives tied to auto-parts exports could finally push manufacturers to build for international markets, instead of just assembling for domestic buyers.

But those incentives need to reward genuine export growth and local value addition, not simply subsidise the same low-localisation assembly model that has defined the industry for decades.

Published in Dawn, September 12th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Regional security
Updated 28 Oct, 2026

Regional security

Iran and the Makkah pact states should pledge not to let external actors use their soil to launch aggression against each other.
Rate hike
28 Oct, 2026

Rate hike

THE SBP’s decision to raise its policy rate by 50 basis points to 12pc was largely expected. It is also justified...
Press solidarity
28 Oct, 2026

Press solidarity

PAKISTAN’S journalists have seldom lacked organisations speaking in defence of press freedom. What has been ...
Privatisation framework
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Privatisation framework

The proposed merger of the Privatisation Commission and the Public-Private Partnership Authority (P3A) into a single institution is a sensible move.
Chromebook scheme
Updated 27 Oct, 2026

Chromebook scheme

Technology can widen opportunity, but only when it is tied to good teaching, reliable connectivity and clear educational purpose.
Dengue season
27 Oct, 2026

Dengue season

ANOTHER dengue outbreak looms over the country for reasons of lack of preparedness and negligence. This month’s...