Australia rejects India’s Basmati trademark bid

Published
0
A customer checks the quality of rice at a wholesale market in Jakarta, Indonesia on Sept 22, 2025. — Reuters/ File
A customer checks the quality of rice at a wholesale market in Jakarta, Indonesia on Sept 22, 2025. — Reuters/ File

ISLAMABAD: The Federal Court of Australia has dismissed an appeal filed by India’s Agricultural and Processed Food Products Export Development Authority (APEDA) in the Basmati trademark case, upholding Pakistan’s longstanding position that Basmati is a geographical indication.

An official announcement issued here quoted the commerce ministry as welcoming the Federal Court of Australia’s decision dismissing APEDA’s appeal in the Basmati trade mark case. The court also ordered the APEDA to pay the respondent’s costs, as agreed or taxed.

Court upholds Pakistan’s GI claim

The APEDA had applied to register the term “Basmati” as a certification trade mark for rice in Australia. The application was rejected by a Delegate of the Australian Registrar of Trade Marks on Dec 22, 2022 on the ground that the word Basmati could not distinguish rice certified by the APEDA from Basmati rice legitimately produced and marketed by other traders.

The APEDA subsequently challenged the decision before the Federal Court of Australia. The Registrar’s decision expressly recognised that Basmati rice is also grown in Pakistan and that Pakistani traders have an equally valid claim to use the term.

By dismissing APEDA’s appeal, the Federal Court has upheld these findings.

The outcome constitutes a significant victory for Pakistan’s position that Basmati originates from a historically recognised growing region spanning Pakistan and India, and that no single national authority can claim an exclusive right to the word Basmati to the exclusion of producers and exporters with an equally legitimate right to its use.

Published in Dawn, August 13th, 2026

Follow Dawn Business on X, LinkedIn, Instagram and Facebook for insights on business, finance and tech from Pakistan and across the world.

Opinion

Editorial

Perilous misstep
Updated 12 Oct, 2026

Perilous misstep

If the authorities felt terrorism was increasing in some tribal districts and adjoining areas, they could have limited themselves to imposing a targeted emergency under Article 232.
Import fraud
12 Oct, 2026

Import fraud

THE under-invoicing of imports from China is not an allegation. It is an open secret in Pakistan’s markets — one...
Paralysed prisons
12 Oct, 2026

Paralysed prisons

PAKISTAN’S overcrowded jails distort the intention of imprisonment — rehabilitation, education, and occupational...
Parliament’s place
Updated 11 Oct, 2026

Parliament’s place

In 2015, the parliament had decided to “maintain neutrality in the Yemen conflict so as to be able to play a proactive diplomatic role to end the crisis”.
Disturbing the peace
11 Oct, 2026

Disturbing the peace

THIS year’s Nobel Peace Prize is well-earned. The winner, South African jurist Dr Navi Pillay, has had an...