Vanishing jobs

Published May 30, 2026 Updated May 30, 2026 06:05am
The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.
The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

IF you’re not paying attention, you should; you really, really should. What is happening in the US — the epicentre of AI transformation — will soon happen everywhere else as well, and the consequences will leave no one untouched. Take, for instance, the latest big story: on May 20, Meta, Facebook’s parent company, began to announce lay-offs. Starting in Singapore, Meta began to lay off 10 per cent of its entire workforce — about 8,000 people. Employees who had until recently thought that their work was bulletproof suddenly found their jobs on the chopping block.

The reasons offered by Meta are instructive, though hardly illuminating. The cause of the lay-offs, it said, was the need to trim its operating costs to be able to afford the new infrastructure that will be required to run its AI processes. This means it may spend billions of dollars in the next few years on building enormous data centres — fuel- and water-guzzling behemoths spread over thousands of acres that will speed up the world’s increasing reliance on AI. The fact, however, is that all the lay-offs combined would only mean a reduction of $1 billion in its budget, which is nothing for a company that says it will spend between $125bn and $145bn on AI in 2026.

One reason that the laid-off people are not needed anymore is that AI has already learned to do what they did. Before the lay-offs, Meta had already deployed agents that were tracking everything these employees were doing. In the past, this sort of software was used to detect whether an employee was actually doing his/her task as opposed to spying on what it is they were doing. In this new age, tracking meant gathering data, including screenshots of what they were looking at in order to train AI agents to do their job. It appears that at least 8,000 jobs were ones that AI could do — possibly more.

Tech workers are the worst-positioned to absorb the shock. Software was crucial to the functioning of the digitised world. The Meta example shows how this is no longer true. In the US, tech workers — many of them Indian immigrants — were proud of their enduring desirability that allowed them to skate through the financial crisis of 2008 without any problem. And Indian software engineers began to project a sort of entitlement — as if they were kings of the tech world doing jobs that the stupid Americans could not do. Except that the AI revolution started in the US, not in India.

Tech workers are the worst positioned to absorb the AI shock.

The invincibility complex of tech workers in the US or those employed by American companies did little to protect them. Many, if not all professionals in the US, do eventually unionise, which gives them leverage with their employers. Pilots, for instance, lobby hard to ensure that their airlines pay them a certain amount and cannot fire them when demand dips or fuel prices skyrocket. Tech workers thought they were so untouchable that they did not need to unionise. The result is that their jobs are on the chopping block. If you have ever used an AI agent, you may be able to understand why this is so. Anthropic’s Claude, for example, can generate code, rendering the ability to write it largely obsolete in certain settings.

This doesn’t mean that all tech workers and software engineers will lose their jobs, but it does mean that the incoming changes will transform the nature of work. To quote Meta head Mark Zuckerberg: “AI is the most consequential technology of our lifetimes. The companies that lead the way will define the next generation.” In other words, humans are no longer the best candidates for the job.

It is not only US companies that are affecting the lan­d­­scape; changing American immigration policy has all but eliminated the H-1B visa through which tech workers from around the world were hired. These policy changes are dictated in part by the view that in 10 years’ time, the workforce will have to be much smaller than it is today. Even the way America looks is changing. AI investors are buying up thousands of acres of land to erect large data centres, which can provide the enormous amounts of computing power required to run AI processes that are replacing human workers. Currently, huge disputes are underway between developers getting ready to set up these centres — the largest planned is in Utah and is spread over 40,000 acres — and those warning of the terrible environmental consequences.

What happens in America — whether spawned by social media, the ubiquity of cell phones or internet culture — will soon happen everywhere else. Pakistan and Pakistanis must ask themselves how prepared they are for a future that will have a very different concept of work, of human intelligence and agency than the one that exists today.

The writer is an attorney teaching constitutional law and political philosophy.

rafia.zakaria@gmail.com

Published in Dawn, May 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Diplomatic resolve
Updated 30 May, 2026

Diplomatic resolve

Iran, too, must engage seriously and provide credible assurances about its nuclear programme if it wants sanctions relief and a more stable relationship with the outside world.
Weaponising water
30 May, 2026

Weaponising water

CLIMATE Minister Musadik Malik’s warning against what he described as “water aggression” indicates ...
Rabies toll
30 May, 2026

Rabies toll

EVERY year, rabies, the deadliest zoonotic disease, kills more than 59,000 people worldwide. In Pakistan, it is one...
Pressure politics
Updated 28 May, 2026

Pressure politics

The attempt to connect the Iran conflict with the Abraham Accords makes little sense.
Eid’s true spirit
Updated 27 May, 2026

Eid’s true spirit

Pakistan celebrates Eid while grappling with economic strain that continues to weigh heavily on ordinary households.
Cotton crisis
Updated 29 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

We need a coherent long-term cotton strategy or else, Pakistan might lose a key pillar of its export economy.