Ceasefire in name

Published

THE ink on the latest ceasefire extension between Israel and Lebanon was barely dry when Israeli warplanes were back in the skies over the south of the latter country. Six people were killed — three of them paramedics serving at a clinic. Meanwhile, villages across southern Lebanon have once again been forced to empty. This is hardly a ceasefire; it is a mere ritual for diplomatic consumption while the bombs continue to fall and kill. The pattern by now is grimly familiar. Israel agrees to pause hostilities, its envoys shake hands in Washington and within hours its military is back at work, reclassifying populated areas as ‘Hezbollah infrastructure’, and resuming what has been by any honest reckoning a campaign of collective punishment. The 45-day extension agreed to recently means little if the same cycle continues to repeat itself — a brief diplomatic interlude followed by renewed bombardment and more casualties in Lebanon’s southern region.

Lebanon is a sovereign state. It is not a theatre for Israeli military doctrine, nor a buffer zone to be reshaped at will. The incremental erosion of its territorial integrity through the continued presence of Israeli forces and the unilateral redrawing of demarcation lines must end. Any framework for lasting peace must begin with an unconditional Israeli withdrawal and genuine respect for Lebanese sovereignty. There can be no durable security architecture built on the rubble of one country’s independence. The international community — the US in particular — must stop treating these ceasefires as achievements. A pause in killing is not peace. The US, which brokered this extension, carries both the leverage and the obligation to hold Israel to account, not just to the letter of temporary truces, but to the enduring principles of international law as well. Lebanon has bled enough. The world cannot keep extending deadlines and disregarding impunity. What is required is not another 45 days of managed violence, but a permanent and verifiable peace.

Published in Dawn, May 19th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Gulf flare-up
Updated 09 Jul, 2026

Gulf flare-up

IS the fragile US-Iran ceasefire — and the memorandum of understanding that underpins it — collapsing? Unless...
Costly food
09 Jul, 2026

Costly food

THE recent decline in diesel and LPG prices should have brought some relief to consumers struggling with high food...
Unliveable city
09 Jul, 2026

Unliveable city

IT comes as no surprise. Karachi — Pakistan’s largest city, its financial engine and home to over 20m people —...
Hamas’s move
Updated 08 Jul, 2026

Hamas’s move

THE decision taken by Hamas to relinquish governance of Gaza appears to be designed to put the onus on the US and...
Terrorism threat
Updated 08 Jul, 2026

Terrorism threat

THE surge in terrorist violence in Balochistan highlights the renewed threat confronting Pakistan. The martyrdom of...
Football meddling
08 Jul, 2026

Football meddling

AFTER ending co-hosts America’s World Cup run in the last-16 stage, Belgium felt justice had been served. It was...