Preserving heritage

Published
1

RECENT restoration work at the World Heritage Sites of Mohra Moradu and Sirkap in Taxila has triggered serious alarm about the stewardship of Pakistan’s archaeological legacy. These sites, layered with centuries of history, now risk being flagged by Unesco as endangered — not because of natural decay but due to ill-judged human intervention. The reported use of cement in repairs, in violation of conservation standards, points to a deeper malaise: a troubling lack of expertise, oversight and commitment within the institutions concerned. Equally alarming is the lack of response by the Punjab Archaeology Department. An urgent communication from the Department of Archaeology and Museums, Islamabad, reportedly went unanswered for weeks. Such indifference is more than bureaucratic inertia; it signals a dangerous disregard for national heritage. Silence, in this context, speaks volumes for the department’s approach towards something so significant. This attitude exposes a broader pattern of neglect. Conservation is not merely about preserving bricks and stones; it demands transparency, collaboration and respect for scholarly input. Yet meaningful engagement with conservation experts and historians remains conspicuously absent. It not only endangers invaluable sites but also weakens Pakistan’s standing as it seeks greater recognition on the global heritage stage. Without investment in specialised training and adherence to international best practices, such self-guided efforts can cause irreversible harm.

Restoration must be guided by science, not convenience. And criticism should be met with professionalism, not silence. This approach of cosmetic fixes that compromises authenticity for short-term appearances cannot continue. The Punjab government must actively engage with the relevant national and international authorities and adopt a posture of openness and accountability in its communication. Being obstinate and insular is precisely the opposite of what is required to safeguard a rich and shared heritage. Perhaps the government should consider a collaborative approach through sustained engagement, which would prove fruitful.

Published in Dawn, March 30th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

Beneath the surface
Updated 09 Oct, 2026

Beneath the surface

The recent round made fewer headlines because the hard bargaining over the budget had already been done.
Moscow disagreement
Updated 09 Oct, 2026

Moscow disagreement

Both the Taliban’s denialism, and Russia’s apparently soft stance towards the Afghan terrorism problem, are unfortunate.
Vanished girls
09 Oct, 2026

Vanished girls

THE scourge of female disappearances in Pakistan should be a matter of shame. Institutional reforms and ...
Conundrum
Updated 08 Oct, 2026

Conundrum

The two sides came close to a breakthrough in the last round. It is hoped that they can cross the finish line on their second attempt.
Gaza’s torment
08 Oct, 2026

Gaza’s torment

THREE years since the Oct 7 Hamas attacks on Israel, the people of Gaza continue to face a nightmarish existence....
The healthy-food gap
08 Oct, 2026

The healthy-food gap

PAKISTAN’S nutrition problem is usually blamed on poverty, poor eating habits or lack of awareness. But according...