Anthropic refuses to allow Pentagon unrestricted use of artificial intelligence

Published February 28, 2026
Anthropic logo is seen in this illustration taken on May 20, 2024. — Reuters/File Photo
Anthropic logo is seen in this illustration taken on May 20, 2024. — Reuters/File Photo

SAN FRANCISCO: AI company Anthropic said on Thursday it would not give the US Defence Department unrestricted use of its technology despite being pressured to comply by the Pentagon.

“These threats do not change our position: we cannot in good conscience accede to their request,” Anthropic chief executive Dario Amodei said in a statement.

Washington had given the artificial intelligence startup until Friday to agree to unconditional military use of its technology, even if it violates ethical standards at the company, or face being forced to comply under emergency federal powers.

Amodei said Anthropic models have been deployed by the Pentagon and intelligence agencies to defend the country but that it draws an ethical line regarding its use for mass surveillance of US citizens and fully-autonomous weapons.

“Using these systems for mass domestic surveillance is incompatible with democratic values,” Amodei said.

And leading AI systems are not yet reliable to be trusted to power deadly weapons without a human in ultimate control, he added.

“We will not knowingly provide a product that puts America’s warfighters and civilians at risk.” After meeting with Anthropic early this week, the Pentagon delivered a stark ultimatum: agree to unrestricted military use of its technology by Saturday or face being forced to comply under the Defence Production Act.

The Cold War-era law, last used during the Covid pandemic, grants the federal government sweeping powers to compel private industry to prioritize national security needs.

The Pentagon also threatened to label Anthropic a supply chain risk, a designation usually reserved for firms from adversary countries that could severely damage the company’s ability to work with the US government and reputation.

A senior Pentagon official at the time pushed back on the company’s concerns, insisting the Defense Department had always operated within the law.

“Legality is the Pentagon’s responsibility as the end user,” the official said, adding that the department “has only given out lawful orders.” Officials also confirmed that an exchange regarding intercontinental ballistic missiles had taken place between Anthropic and the Pentagon, underscoring the sensitivity of the applications at the heart of the dispute.

Published in Dawn, February 28th, 2026

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...