• Asif says Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry has every right to comment on Imran’s ‘anti-state’ narrative
• Questions opposition party’s patriotism
• Ahsan Iqbal asserts he would have used harsher language if it were him

ISLAMABAD: Federal ministers on Saturday blasted the PTI for its reaction to a press conference by Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR) Director General Lt Gen Ahmed Sharif Chaudhry, wherein he had launched a scathing attack on party founder Imran Khan.

On Friday, Lt Gen Chaudhry — without once naming Imran — called the former premier “a mentally ill person”, “a narcissist” and “a security risk”, while stressing it was for the government to decide how to deal with him.

He accused Mr Khan and his party of pushing a narrative designed to undermine the armed forces and destabilise the state.

In response, PTI Chairman Barrister Gohar Ali expressed “disappointment” over the comments, stating that the party’s “narrative has never been, nor will it ever be, anti-state”.

Speaking to the media in Sialkot, Defence Minister Khawaja Asif recalled that Mr Khan had used “harsh language” in the past for members of the opposition, insisting that the PTI had no right to object to the comments by the military’s spokesman.

‘Guarded reaction’

“When they were in power, I remember, he [Mr Khan] would engage in theatrics and sometimes don a dupatta to mimic leaders. He did that for Mehmood Khan Achakzai, who is with him today. He would also use derogatory language for women,” the defence minister said, adding that the incarcerated leader continued to do the same via statements made on his X account.

“If DG ISPR has given a reaction, I believe it is a guarded reaction,” he said.

The minister assailed the PTI for engaging in activities that were reflective of an “anti-state” narrative. He deplored that the party leadership did not “acknowledge” the sacrifices of the armed forces in the fight against terrorism.

“I have attended the funerals of many martyrs … I have never seen someone from the PTI there,” the defence minister said, urging the party to “speak in favour of martyrs and not terrorists”.

“Do not attempt to hold dialogue with terrorists or take a soft stance with them,” Mr Asif warned, telling the PTI that “when you continue to adopt such an approach, this is exactly the kind of language that will be used against you”.

Patriotism questioned

Mr Asif was of the view that while the military spokesman was “still careful with his words”, he, however, had the liberty to give the PTI founder a “hard-hitting answer”.

Referring to interviews given by Mr Khan’s sisters to the Indian media, Mr Asif assailed the party for “engaging with the enemy”.

“How can they call themselves Pakistanis and patriots?” he questioned.

The defence minister further said the PTI’s “sole ideology is to gain power”, alleging that the pa­­rty had no “allegiance to Pakistan”.

Referring to the May conflict with India, Mr Asif said that while all neighbouring countries expre­s­sed sympathy over the martyrdom of Pakistani soldiers and stood with the country during the fighting, one political party at home “played no role” in confronting the enemy.

“The PTI leader has something to say about everything; why did he not say anything during the conflict for our armed forces [with India]?” he asked. “He [DG ISPR] has every right to say it.” In a warning to the PTI, the defence minister said: “Do your politics, hold protests, but do not threaten the sovereignty and honour of Pakistan.”

‘Stronger words’

Speaking at an event in Lahore, Planning Minister Ahsan Iqbal also defended the DG ISPR and censured the PTI for its response, the state-run APP reported.

He claimed that the DG ISPR’s press conference had become “necessary under the circumstances”.

Mr Iqbal noted that the armed forces were making immense sacrifices in the fight against terrorism, and any attempt to “unfairly criticise or target” the institution would be dealt with strictly.

“If it were me [instead of the DG ISPR], I would have used even stronger words.”

Published in Dawn, December 7th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Water win
19 May, 2026

Water win

Besides being a technical and legal win, the ruling validates Pakistan’s argument about the existential stakes involved for it.
Free ride
19 May, 2026

Free ride

THE federal and provincial governments have extended what appear to be major concessions to the retail sector ahead...
Ceasefire in name
19 May, 2026

Ceasefire in name

THE ink on the latest ceasefire extension between Israel and Lebanon was barely dry when Israeli warplanes were back...
The Afghan problem
Updated 18 May, 2026

The Afghan problem

It is to its own peril that the Afghan side seems to be mistaking Islamabad’s restraint for lack of resolve.
Unwillingness to tax
18 May, 2026

Unwillingness to tax

THE latest IMF staff report reveals the scale of Pakistan’s fiscal dilemma. The approval of fresh disbursements...
Unkind cyberspace
18 May, 2026

Unkind cyberspace

WHEN abuse occurs face to face, the boundaries are clear. Yet, the same behaviour online is treated less seriously....