Decision to slash KE’s base tariff reflects collective wisdom, says Nepra

Published October 30, 2025
In this file photo, the Natio­nal Electric Power Regula­tory Authority (Nepra) logo is visible on the side of the building. — APP/File
In this file photo, the Natio­nal Electric Power Regula­tory Authority (Nepra) logo is visible on the side of the building. — APP/File

ISLAMABAD: The National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Nepra) on Wednesday evaded a direct comment on its recent decision of reducing the K-Electric’s multiyear tariff by about Rs7 per unit.

During a public hearing on Central Power Purchasing Agency’s request for negative fuel cost adjustment (FCA) for electricity consumed in September, a questioner wondered if the regulator had used collective wisdom in reducing KE’s base tariff by almost 20 per cent that would cut government subsidies by about Rs7 per unit and how these calculations were made in May and then in October.

Nepra’s Member (Legal) Amina Ahmed, who presided over the public hearing, said the signatures on the Nepra’s determination meant collective wisdom was involved and detailed explanations for revisions in various tariff parameters had been detailed in the judgement.

She said the regulator did not calculate a subsidy element as it was not Nepra’s job.

Earlier, CPPA’s Chief Executive Officer Rehan Akhtar told the public hearing that the actual fuel cost in September was lower than already charged to consumers and hence a refund of 37-paisa per unit was required for consumers across the country.

He said the consumers had already paid a positive FCA of eight-paisa per unit in October that now stood expired. Therefore, net relief to consumers would work out at 45-paisa per unit upon regulatory approval.

He told the hearing that consumption in September 2025 was around 24pc higher than same month of last year owing to prolonged summer, but was 5pc lower than August and 3pc lower that the estimates made for reference September tariff.

Industrial consumption, he said, had also dropped due to macroeconomic factors, higher electricity costs and solarisation.

He explained that hydropower generation was better than estimated but forced outages at few thermal and nuclear power plants and lower availability of local gas at Uch, Balochistan and LNG entailed induction of expensive sources. Otherwise, FCA would have been larger, he said.

Published in Dawn, October 30th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

‘Missing’ LGs
29 Jun, 2026

‘Missing’ LGs

Across the world, successful civic governance is made possible through effective, responsive local bodies, which are closest to the voter.
Audit or ritual?
29 Jun, 2026

Audit or ritual?

THE AGP’s latest audit report of federal civil accounts is a detailed record of governance failures and...
Al Aqsa under threat
29 Jun, 2026

Al Aqsa under threat

NOT satisfied with the genocidal violence it has unleashed in Gaza, the current Israeli administration is doing all...
Truce tested
Updated 28 Jun, 2026

Truce tested

The latest US-Iran exchange should therefore be treated not as proof that dialogue has failed, but as a warning of how easily it could.
Paper promises
28 Jun, 2026

Paper promises

WHAT is a UNSC resolution worth if it is never implemented? Pakistan and China felt compelled to convene an informal...
Still the masters
28 Jun, 2026

Still the masters

CRISTIANO Ronaldo and Lionel Messi do not seem to be going away quietly. At least, not yet. The duo might have left...