SAHIWAL: Major farmers’ organisations reject recently-announced Rs15 billion ‘Kisan Package’ by the chief minister.

They argue that farmers do not need loan schemes and plastic cards but rather a fair support price for wheat and other agriculture products, a clear procurement target, reduction in costs for agricultural inputs such as fertilisers, seeds and pesticides, and a flat electricity rate for agricultural tubewells.

Critics claim the package primarily benefits flour mill owners, middlemen, stockists, warehouse owners, commission agents but does not address the hardships faced by farmers Pakistan Kisan Ittehad (Khalid Mahmood Khokhar group) and Kisan Ittehad (Khalid Bath group) have completely rejected the initiative.

Speaking to Dawn by phone, Khalid Mahmood Khokhar said “what we need is a fair rate for our produce, along with a 25pc profit margin.”

He said agricultural experts calculate per-acre cost of wheat and other agriculture products and set a support price for each crop by including a 25pc profit margin for farmers. He said there are 5.5 million farmers in Punjab and under the Rs 15 billion each will get only a few thousands rupees.

He said a fair support price will directly benefit farmers and strengthen the agricultural sector, ensuring financial stability for those who cultivate the land. “However, the Punjab government’s announcement of a 25pc storage facility effectively legitimises stockists who buy crops at lower rates, store them in warehouses, and later sell them at inflated prices for maximum profit.”

He said ordinary farmers lack financial capacity to hold their crops for extended periods but capitalists can afford to do so. “Unfortunately, storage resources remain in the hands of feudal landlords, capitalists and industrialists.”

Chaudhry Rizwan, provincial head of PKI, says 100pc markup policy favors flour mill owners and large brokers. “The newly-introduced Electronic Warehouse Receipt (EWR) system will primarily serve middlemen, who already dominate the market, working against farmers’ interests instead of supporting them.”

Khalid Bath criticised the policy-making process, questioning how agricultural policies could be worked out without involving farmers’ organisations. “Not a single farmers’ organisation or other stakeholders were consulted while framing the agriculture package,” he said.

Farooq Tariq, Chairman of the Kisan Rabta Committee — an umbrella organisation representing 36 farmers’ groups across Pakistan — also rejected the package. He alleged that the government is paving the way for corporate farming by marginalising farmers.

Published in Dawn, April 19th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Unsustainable growth
Updated 23 Jun, 2026

Unsustainable growth

CLICHÉS are an essential part of political rhetoric. But when repeated often, they lose their impact. So when...
Banned speeches
23 Jun, 2026

Banned speeches

NATIONAL Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq on Sunday formally lifted long-standing restrictions on the airing of ...
New GB government
23 Jun, 2026

New GB government

WITH the newly elected lawmakers of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly taking oath on Monday, the PPP looks set to head...
A costly cut
Updated 22 Jun, 2026

A costly cut

Climate risks are increasing and public investment should reflect that reality.
Guarded access
22 Jun, 2026

Guarded access

ONE of the government’s ‘novel’ proposals to snag tax evaders has collided with some harsh realities. On...
Lyari’s passion
22 Jun, 2026

Lyari’s passion

THE love for football in Lyari knows no bounds. The World Cup might be underway thousands of miles away in North...