WATCHING and reading about the ongoing conflicts, especially in the Middle East and Africa, is heart-breaking. The moti-vations for these wars are not necessarily internal, but are laced with international complicities. In Gaza, for instance, different actors and factors profoundly impact the state of affairs.

Hamas, which is a group that has gained much strength with the support of Iran and is also a part of the network of other militant groups in the area, exercises its control over Gaza.

The role of Iran is to counter the power of Israel, and to expand its own influence in the region. Turkiye, Qatar and others are also supporting the Palestinians in exchange for their influence in the larger Arab world.

Israel occupies an essential position in the conflict wheel, with its military operations, blockades and policies on settlements increasingly contributing to tensions and humanitarian crises.

On its back happens to be the United States and the West at large, thus altering the regional equilibrium of power and rendering the process of peace more challenging.

The operations of these local and global players not only perpetuate the violence, but also cause shifts in the political climate in Gaza as well as other Palestinian territories.

In the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), many external actors have become involved, and their influence has often led to an increased level of violence.

The influential roles of Rwanda and Uganda are central in the equation, as they often mediate the conflict, sometimes by supporting different rebel groups.

Multinational companies, profit-driven as they are, have to enter into some kind of arrangement with rebellious groups to exploit valuable materials, such as coltan and diamonds.

Also, some Western countries have been favouring the military as well as some groups based purely on their own geopolitical interests.

In Sudan, the basic struggle is among military factions, such as the Sudanese Armed Forces (SAF) and the Rapid Support Forces (RSF). But the external influences have largely determined the conflict.

While Egypt and some Gulf states are involved, it is China that has emerged as the most potent force owing to its massive investment in oil and infra-structure projects, mostly in favour of the regime, to ensure continued access to resources.

Simply put, the common element in all these conflicts is access to resources that is likely to add to the geopolitical clout of the regional and global players involved.

Faisal Habib
Karachi

Published in Dawn, March 10th, 2025

Opinion

Trouble at home

Trouble at home

The country’s strength lies in its political and economic stability, not in fleeting moments of diplomatic success.

Editorial

Pezeshkian’s visit
Updated 24 Jun, 2026

Pezeshkian’s visit

Perhaps a good place to start would be the resumption of work on the Iran-Pakistan gas pipeline.
Telecom bill
24 Jun, 2026

Telecom bill

THERE is now no question about it: the Pakistan Telecommunication (Re-organisation) (Amendment) Bill of 2026 is a...
Updating Islamabad
24 Jun, 2026

Updating Islamabad

ISLAMABAD is growing rapidly. Its planning, however, remains stuck in bureaucratic limbo. Despite years of ...
Unsustainable growth
Updated 23 Jun, 2026

Unsustainable growth

CLICHÉS are an essential part of political rhetoric. But when repeated often, they lose their impact. So when...
Banned speeches
23 Jun, 2026

Banned speeches

NATIONAL Assembly Speaker Ayaz Sadiq on Sunday formally lifted long-standing restrictions on the airing of ...
New GB government
23 Jun, 2026

New GB government

WITH the newly elected lawmakers of the Gilgit-Baltistan Assembly taking oath on Monday, the PPP looks set to head...