THIS is with reference to the report ‘Teachers call for unity to fight univer-sities amendment law’ (Feb 7) related to the ongoing rift between the Sindh government and university teachers across the province over the Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act. Despite stiff opposition by faculty mem-bers, the government seems determined to push ahead with its plan.

Through the amendment, not only PhD professors working in universities, but also senior bureaucrats of BPS 21-22 and PhD holders with 15 years of experience working in various institutions, including government, non-government and private organisations, have been declared eligible to apply for the position of vice-chancellor of universities in Sindh.

Why was such an amendment needed? This is a critical question. I believe that if the search committees appointed from time to time had consisted of competent, honest and impartial members, and had been given a free hand, this amendment might not have been necessary at all.

If vice-chancellors were not subjected to pressure and interference from various unions, staff, officers and faculty, they could have performed their duties more effectively. If faculty members had focussed solely on their primary responsibilities — teaching and research — this amen-dment might not have been needed.

Had the vice-chancellors not treated universities as their fiefdoms, and had made all decisions based purely on merit, the government might not have felt the need for such an amendment.

The financial affairs, recruitments and promotions in universities must be thoroughly audited. Now, doors remain open for senior professors as well. Based on their education, experience, compe-tence and reputation, they can compete with bureaucrats and prove themselves superior.

The majority of bureaucrats do not enjoy a good reputation among the public. They will face a tough challenge and will have to prove that they are truly qualified for this position. The vice-chancellor-ship is no bed of roses. They will not have the freedom to do as they please.

Dr Mehboob Shaikh
Karachi

Published in Dawn, February 9th, 2025

Must Read

Ukraine, Nato and the future of Europe

Ukraine, Nato and the future of Europe

The spectacle of the verbal spat between US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Vlodomyr Zelensky in the Oval Office was stark evidence of a tectonic shift in longstanding US foreign policy on Ukraine, Russia, Europe and Nato.

Opinion

Editorial

After the review
Updated 16 Mar, 2025

After the review

Should prepare economy for durable growth by attracting foreign private investments to boost productivity and exports.
Embracing crypto
16 Mar, 2025

Embracing crypto

IT seems a little prod was all it took for Pakistan to finally ‘embrace the future’. The Pakistan Crypto Council...
Fault lines
16 Mar, 2025

Fault lines

IT was a distressing spectacle, though a sadly predictable one. As the National Assembly took up for discussion the...
Revised solar policy
Updated 15 Mar, 2025

Revised solar policy

Criticism policy revisions misplaced as these will increase payback periods for consumers with oversized solar systems.
Toxic prejudice
15 Mar, 2025

Toxic prejudice

WITH far-right movements on the march across the world, it is no surprise that anti-Muslim bias is witnessing high...
Children in jails
15 Mar, 2025

Children in jails

PAKISTAN’S children in prison have often been treated like adult criminals. The Sindh government’s programme to...