THIS is with reference to the report ‘Teachers call for unity to fight univer-sities amendment law’ (Feb 7) related to the ongoing rift between the Sindh government and university teachers across the province over the Sindh Universities and Institutes Laws (Amendment) Act. Despite stiff opposition by faculty mem-bers, the government seems determined to push ahead with its plan.

Through the amendment, not only PhD professors working in universities, but also senior bureaucrats of BPS 21-22 and PhD holders with 15 years of experience working in various institutions, including government, non-government and private organisations, have been declared eligible to apply for the position of vice-chancellor of universities in Sindh.

Why was such an amendment needed? This is a critical question. I believe that if the search committees appointed from time to time had consisted of competent, honest and impartial members, and had been given a free hand, this amendment might not have been necessary at all.

If vice-chancellors were not subjected to pressure and interference from various unions, staff, officers and faculty, they could have performed their duties more effectively. If faculty members had focussed solely on their primary responsibilities — teaching and research — this amen-dment might not have been needed.

Had the vice-chancellors not treated universities as their fiefdoms, and had made all decisions based purely on merit, the government might not have felt the need for such an amendment.

The financial affairs, recruitments and promotions in universities must be thoroughly audited. Now, doors remain open for senior professors as well. Based on their education, experience, compe-tence and reputation, they can compete with bureaucrats and prove themselves superior.

The majority of bureaucrats do not enjoy a good reputation among the public. They will face a tough challenge and will have to prove that they are truly qualified for this position. The vice-chancellor-ship is no bed of roses. They will not have the freedom to do as they please.

Dr Mehboob Shaikh
Karachi

Published in Dawn, February 9th, 2025

Opinion

A changed world

A changed world

The phrase ‘security provider’ sounds impressive but there is little clarity on what it means for the country.

Editorial

Bannu attack
Updated 12 May, 2026

Bannu attack

The security narrative and strategy of the KP government diverges considerably from the state’s position.
Cotton crisis
12 May, 2026

Cotton crisis

PAKISTAN’S cotton economy is once again facing a crisis that exposes the country’s flawed agricultural and...
Buddhist heritage
12 May, 2026

Buddhist heritage

THE revival of Buddhist chants at the ancient Dharmarajika Stupa in Taxila after nearly 1,500 years is much more ...
New regional order
Updated 11 May, 2026

New regional order

The fact is that the US has only one true security commitment in the Middle East — Israel.
A better start
11 May, 2026

A better start

THE first 1,000 days of a child’s life often shape decades to come. In Pakistan, where chronic malnutrition has...
Widening gap
11 May, 2026

Widening gap

PAKISTAN’S monthly trade deficit ballooned to $4.07bn last month, its highest level since June 2022, further...