ISLAMABAD: Television anchors filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court on Friday, challenging recent amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) and seeking to have it declared null and void.

Anchorpersons Hamid Mir, Naseem Zahra, Adnan Haider and Amir Abbas submitted the petition through Islamabad High Court Bar Association President Riasat Ali Azad and Advocate Imran Shafiq.

The petition argued that the amendments violated fundamental rights, especially those related to freedom of speech and press freedom. The petitioners contended that the amendments granted excessive powers to authorities, potentially leading to censorship and suppression of journalistic independence.

Legal experts have also expressed concerns about the vague and broad provisions of the amended law, which could be used to target journalists and media professionals.

On Thursday, a faction of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists filed an identical petition before the IHC, challenging the amendments to Peca 2025.

Petition argues amendments violate fundamental rights

The petitioner contended that several provisions of the amended law were overly broad, vague, and susceptible to arbitrary enforcement, posing a threat to civil liberties.

Key objections included the ambiguous definition of “social media platforms”, which could be extended to various online services, and provisions regulating “unlawful” and “offensive” content that are subjective and prone to misuse.

The petition also raised concerns about restrictions on criticism and dissent under the guise of preventing “aspersion”.

Furthermore, the petition pointed to the extensive powers granted to the regulatory authority under Chapter 1-A, particularly sections 2C and 2B, which allowed the removal and blocking of online content without adequate oversight.

The establishment of the Council and Tribunal under sections 2(T) and 2(V) has been criticised for lacking independence and impartiality.

Additionally, the petition argued that the amendment contradicted fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 2-4, 8, 10A, 14, 18-19A, 25, 33 and 37-38 of the Constitution.

It asserted that the amended law disproportionately affected journalists and media professionals, potentially stifling press freedom and investigative reporting.

The petition requested the court to declare the Prevention of Elec­tronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, unconstitutional and void, while seeking an immediate injunction to prevent its enforcement, particularly against journalists.

Published in Dawn, February 8th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

A difficult story
Updated 12 Jun, 2026

A difficult story

Unless productivity becomes the dominant target of economic policy, Pakistan will continue to oscillate between crises and fragile recovery.
Rough waters
12 Jun, 2026

Rough waters

AMONGST the key potential triggers for fresh conflict in South Asia is water. The Indian state is behaving in an...
Politicised football
12 Jun, 2026

Politicised football

ALMOST three-and-half years since Lionel Messi led Argentina to FIFA World Cup glory, the latest edition of...
GB polls’ aftermath
Updated 11 Jun, 2026

GB polls’ aftermath

The new administration must address the region’s issues proactively.
Peace in retreat
11 Jun, 2026

Peace in retreat

THE ceasefire announced in April was supposed to create space for negotiations. Instead, it has been repeatedly...
A few good men
11 Jun, 2026

A few good men

IT was a brave move, no doubt. This Tuesday, in the land of the Afghan Taliban, a few good men decided to take a...