ISLAMABAD: Television anchors filed a petition in the Islamabad High Court on Friday, challenging recent amendments to the Prevention of Electronic Crimes Act (Peca) and seeking to have it declared null and void.

Anchorpersons Hamid Mir, Naseem Zahra, Adnan Haider and Amir Abbas submitted the petition through Islamabad High Court Bar Association President Riasat Ali Azad and Advocate Imran Shafiq.

The petition argued that the amendments violated fundamental rights, especially those related to freedom of speech and press freedom. The petitioners contended that the amendments granted excessive powers to authorities, potentially leading to censorship and suppression of journalistic independence.

Legal experts have also expressed concerns about the vague and broad provisions of the amended law, which could be used to target journalists and media professionals.

On Thursday, a faction of the Pakistan Federal Union of Journalists filed an identical petition before the IHC, challenging the amendments to Peca 2025.

Petition argues amendments violate fundamental rights

The petitioner contended that several provisions of the amended law were overly broad, vague, and susceptible to arbitrary enforcement, posing a threat to civil liberties.

Key objections included the ambiguous definition of “social media platforms”, which could be extended to various online services, and provisions regulating “unlawful” and “offensive” content that are subjective and prone to misuse.

The petition also raised concerns about restrictions on criticism and dissent under the guise of preventing “aspersion”.

Furthermore, the petition pointed to the extensive powers granted to the regulatory authority under Chapter 1-A, particularly sections 2C and 2B, which allowed the removal and blocking of online content without adequate oversight.

The establishment of the Council and Tribunal under sections 2(T) and 2(V) has been criticised for lacking independence and impartiality.

Additionally, the petition argued that the amendment contradicted fundamental rights enshrined in Articles 2-4, 8, 10A, 14, 18-19A, 25, 33 and 37-38 of the Constitution.

It asserted that the amended law disproportionately affected journalists and media professionals, potentially stifling press freedom and investigative reporting.

The petition requested the court to declare the Prevention of Elec­tronic Crimes (Amendment) Act, 2025, unconstitutional and void, while seeking an immediate injunction to prevent its enforcement, particularly against journalists.

Published in Dawn, February 8th, 2025

Opinion

Editorial

Immunity gap
26 Apr, 2026

Immunity gap

VACCINES rarely make the headlines unless there is an outbreak. This World Immunisation Week, it is a moment to...
Danger on repeat
26 Apr, 2026

Danger on repeat

DISASTERS have typically been framed as acts of nature. Of late, they look increasingly like tests of preparedness...
Loose lips
26 Apr, 2026

Loose lips

PAKISTANIS have by now gained something of an international reputation for their gallows humour, but it seems that...
Lebanon truce
Updated 25 Apr, 2026

Lebanon truce

THE fact that the truce between Israel and Lebanon has been extended for three weeks should be welcomed. But there...
Terrorism again
25 Apr, 2026

Terrorism again

THE elimination of 22 terrorists in an intelligence-based operation in Khyber highlights both the scale and ...
Taxing technology
25 Apr, 2026

Taxing technology

THE recent decision by the FBR’s Directorate General of Customs Valuation to increase the ‘assessed value’ of...