MUZAFFARABAD: The Azad Jammu and Kas­hmir (AJK) Supreme Court on Tuesday suspen­ded the enforcement of ‘Pea­ceful Assembly and Public Order Ordinance, 2024’, while admitting two appeals against a high court ruling that had upheld the contentious law.

The ordinance was originally challenged in the AJK high court by three members of the Central Bar Association, Muzaffar­abad, and the AJK Bar Council.

However, the high court dismissed the petitions in limine, prompting both parties to file petitions for leave to appeal in the SC to get the high court ruling overturned.

Representing both parties, senior lawyers Raja Sajjad Ahmed and Raja Amjad Ali Khan alleged that the high court had disregarded critical points raised in the petitions questioning the legality of the ordinance.

They contended the legislature was not vested with powers to deprive the state subjects of the fundamental rights guaranteed under the AJK’s interim constitution and therefore the impugned ordinance amounted to violating the Constitution.

Furthermore, they maintained that existing laws were sufficient to regulate the exercise of these rights, making the new ordinance unnecessary and excessive.

Led by AJK Chief Jus­tice Raja Saeed Akram, the SC full bench granted interim relief by suspending the ordinance until the disposal of the case.

Converting both leave to appeals into regular appeals, the SC clubbed them together to be heard as a single regular case and announced that a detailed judgement would follow after comprehensive hearings.

Strike call unchanged

The suspension of the ordinance came less than 48 hours before a state-wide strike planned by the Jammu & Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JKJAAC), a coalition of civil society organisations, primarily representing traders.

Shaukat Nawaz Mir, a core committee member of the JKJAAC, welcomed the SC intervention, but announced that the strike would proceed unless the government formally repealed the ordinance and released activists detained for opposing it.

“The ordinance was a targeted move to suppress the JKJAAC,” he claimed. “We were not a party to the court petitions against it, nor has the Supreme Court restricted us from protesting. This time, an even larger number of people will take to the streets,” he said.

The committee and other civil society groups hold the view that the ordinance infringes on the people’s constitutional right to peaceful assembly and expression, raising questions about the balance between maintaining public order and safeguarding civil liberties in the liberated territory.

Published in Dawn, December 4th, 2024

Opinion

From hard to harder

From hard to harder

Instead of ‘hard state’ turning even harder, citizens deserve a state that goes soft on them in delivering democratic and development aspirations.

Editorial

Canal unrest
Updated 03 Apr, 2025

Canal unrest

With rising water scarcity in Indus system, it is crucial to move towards a consensus-driven policymaking process.
Iran-US tension
03 Apr, 2025

Iran-US tension

THE Trump administration’s threats aimed at Iran do not bode well for global peace, and unless Washington changes...
Flights to history
03 Apr, 2025

Flights to history

MOHENJODARO could have been the forgotten gold we desperately need. Instead, this 5,000-year-old well of antiquity ...
Eid amidst crises
Updated 31 Mar, 2025

Eid amidst crises

Until the Muslim world takes practical steps to end these atrocities, these besieged populations will see no joy.
Women’s rights
Updated 01 Apr, 2025

Women’s rights

Such judgements, and others directly impacting women’s rights should be given more airtime in media.
Not helping
Updated 02 Apr, 2025

Not helping

If it's committed to peace in Balochistan, the state must draw a line between militancy and legitimate protest.